Laserfiche WebLink
The major water rights owned by the applicant are from the Vulcan Ditch, which originates in <br />Canyon Creek, a tributary to the Colorado River on the north side of the river. The water from this <br />ditch is siphoned underneath the Colorado River and has historically been used to flood irrigate the <br />alluvial valley floor north and east ofthe surface facilities. Since plans to operate the mine have been <br />abandoned, there will be no consumptive use of water other than irrigation. During low-flow periods, <br />the applicant has committed to giving priority to imgation of the historic alluvial valley floor. <br />Accordingly, the operation is not expected to impact flows in the Colorado River, or to have a <br />negative impact on surface water rights holders. <br />An analysis of Probable Hydrologic Consequences of the Coal Ridge No. l Mine has been performed <br />by the applicant, as required under Rule 2.05.6(3). Several effects from the proposed operations <br />which were identified never occurred. Therefore there have not been and aze not predicted to be <br />effects which would adversely impact the overall hydrologic balance of the permit and adjacent <br />areas. The operations proposed within the permit area were designed to prevent material damage to <br />the hydrologic balance outside the proposed permit azea. Appropriate measures within the <br />application were implemented to ensure the protection of the quality and quantity of surface and <br />ground waters within both the proposed permit and adjacent azeas, from the adverse effects of the <br />proposed mining activities. <br />The assessment ofthe probable cumulative impacts of all anticipated coal mining in the general area <br />on the hydrologic balance, as described in 2.05.6(3), has been made and updated by the Division. <br />This assessment, entitled Cumulative Hydrologic Impact Rssessment for the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin, Volume 17, is available for inspection at the offices of the Division. The Division finds that the <br />reclamation operations proposed under the application have been designed to prevent damage to the <br />hydrologic balance outside the proposed permit azea. <br />In conclusion, no significant impacts to the hydrologic balance are projected at the Coal Ridge No. 1 <br />facilities. Monitoring data from 1988 to present indicate no adverse impacts which could be <br />attributed to the operation have occurred. The Division finds that there would be no, or insignificant, <br />probable hydrologic impacts from approval of the application. <br />IV. Topsoil <br />Baseline soils information, topsoil removal and redistribution plans aze found in pages 3-54 to 3- <br />61, 4-45, 4-55 to 4-56 and 4-63 in permit Volume I, as well as Appendix 3.5-1 in Volume II of <br />the PAP. <br />The two soil types occurring within the proposed area aze the Heldt Silty Clay with an average <br />salvage depth to 60 inches and the Nihil Stony Loam with an average salvage depth to 12 inches. <br />Most of the surface and subsurface soil horizons rate fair to good as a source of topsoil material, <br />exhibiting both low electrical conductivity and sodium absorption ratios. <br />All available topsoil within the disturbed azea was salvaged. Most of the topsoil has been <br />replaced following backfilling and grading. The two remaining topsoil stockpiles will be used <br />during reclamation of the sediment pond. <br />20 June 1, 2006 <br />