My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL50299
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL50299
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:34:15 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:51:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/23/1996
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR RN2
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
c. Background salinity levels in the lower segment of Dry Creek from the <br />Yampa River upstream to Section 28, Township 6 North, Range 88 <br />West are high enough that no degradation of water quality is <br />anticipated due to mining. Agricultural areas potentially impacted by <br />increased salinity levels include two small subirrigated grass hayfields in <br />Section 9, TSN, R88W and flood irrigated grass and alfalfa haylands in <br />Section 28, T6N, R88W. <br />With respect to the flood irrigated fields in Section 28, the application <br />indicates and includes detailed mapping and aerial photographs which <br />show that the subject fields are irrigated by water from J.C. Temple <br />Reservoir #1, not from Dry Creek. Thus, water supplying the irrigated <br />fields would not be affected by the mining operation. <br />With respect to the subirrigated fields in Section 9, the applicant <br />conducted a detailed evaluation of the potential reduction in crop <br />production resulting from the projected increase in salinity of the <br />alluvial water. The material damage evaluation is presented on pages <br />47 and 48 of Tab 17. The evaluation projects a potential production <br />decline of 1.9%, which is considered to be a negligible impact, pursuant <br />to the Division's material damage guidelines. <br />There is no projected diminution of water quantity supplied to the Dry <br />Creek AVF. <br />3) Surface coal mining and reclamation operations will be conducted to <br />preserve the essential hydrologic functions of alluvial valley floors outside <br />the permit area and to reestablish the essential hydrologic functions of <br />alluvial valley floors within the affected area throughout the mining and <br />reclamation process (4.24.2). <br />An environmental monitoring system as described in Tab 15 of the permit <br />application has been installed, maintained, and operated by the permittee <br />on all alluvial valley floors during surface coal mining and reclamation <br />operations and continued until all bonds are released in accordance with <br />Rule 3 (4.24.4). <br />Plans and commitments contained in Tabs 15 through 18, and Tab 22, <br />adequately address those measures which will be taken to monitor potential <br />impacts and insure that the essential hydrologic functions of alluvial valley <br />floors within the permit area are reestablished after mining and that the <br />essential hydrologic functions of alluvial valley floors outside the permit area <br />are preserved during and after mining. if future monitoring of affected <br />surface and ground waters indicates trends which necessitate alteration of <br />the projections upon which these AVF findings are based, the findings will <br />be reevaluated and modified as appropriate. <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.