My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL50299
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL50299
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:34:15 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:51:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/23/1996
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR RN2
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Flow and water quality measurements are taken at all three sedimentation <br />ponds, in accordance with the Colorado Discharge Permit System permit <br />issued by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, <br />Water Quality Control Division. <br />The permit application contains provisions for ongoing surface water <br />monitoring. The water monitoring plan is detailed in Tab 15. <br />F. Probable Hydrologic Consequences <br />A determination of the probable hydrologic consequences of the mining and <br />reclamation activities at the Seneca II-W Mine site has been made by the <br />applicant and is found in Tab 17 of the permit application. This section <br />includes an evaluation of quantity and quality effects on ground and surface <br />water systems and mitigative measures to be taken both during and after <br />mining. <br />The Probable Hydrologic Consequences section of this document is divided <br />into two main subsections: Ground Water Effects and Surface Water <br />Effects. <br />Ground Water Effects <br />Probable hydrologic consequences to the ground water regime will be minor. <br />Localized effects to the hydrologic system will include: <br />1) the drawdown of ground water, due to pit dewatering, for a few <br />hundred to perhaps 1,000 feet from the pit; <br />2) possibly diminished quantity and quality of water in the Temple Well <br />no. 1; and <br />3) the probable dewatering and degradation of quality in three to five <br />springs in the permit area, two of which are used for stock watering <br />purposes; <br />4) the possible increase in water and decrease in quality of alluvial water <br />in Hubberson Gulch and its unnamed tributary along the access road, <br />due to infiltration of spoils discharge; <br />5) the establishment of a relatively unconfined aquifer of poor quality in <br />the backfilled pits. A discussion of the potential impacts follows; <br />During mining, inflows may be expected to develop from perched aquifers <br />within the Williams Fork overburden, from a limited Williams Fork <br />overburden aquifer, and from the Wadge coal aquifer. Coal removal is by <br />an updip strip method. As a general rule, more water will be encountered <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.