My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL50229
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL50229
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:33:17 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:48:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/18/2006
Doc Name
Mining Plan Dec. Doc COC-62920 for PR8 King II Mine
From
OSM
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14. Invasive, Non-native Species <br />• Prevention, eazly detection, control and eradication of small noxious weed patches remain the most <br />practical, economical and effective means of weed management. Weeds will be treated on an as <br />needed basis. <br />Signature of specialist: Mary Lendman 2; 27/01 <br />NON-CRITICAL ELEMENTS <br />Soils <br />Since only mitrimal active surface disturbance is proposed, soil impacts from these impacts would <br />be minimal. Subsidence could occur, which could result in some low-volume, localized soil <br />erosion. At the time that support pillars are removed, a cumulative impact from subsidence could <br />occur throughout the mined azea. However, in light oftherequirement in State regulations to conduct <br />operations in such a manner as to control or prevent effects of subsidence, this is not expected to be <br />a major concern. <br />2. Geolob ~ and Mineral Resources <br />• Subsidence fractures could impact topography and surface features in the area of the proposed lease. <br />The DMG rules require that "underground mining activities shall be planned and conducted so as <br />to prevent subsidence from causing material damage to the surface..." Material damage is defined <br />with respect to subsidence as changes which prevent restoration of affected Structures and with <br />respect to renewable resource lands; changes which disrupt an aquifer, or a rechazge area to an <br />' aquifer, which serves as a beneficial use of water; or changes which prevent restoration of <br />productivity for agticultural lands. <br />In addition, National King Coal's permits to mine coal from Colorado DMG and OSM require that <br />the company monitor subsidence on a quarterly basis. Some monitoring is also preformed <br />periodically by the various regulating agencies (OSM and DMG) during inspections. <br />Evidence of subsidence fractures following pillar extraction in 1979 has been noted on National <br />• King Coal's Federal lease P-058300 in an area approximately 300 feet north of the lease boundary <br />and on the east limb of the lease above the.westem edge of pillars that were extracted. Subsidence <br />fractures have also been observed in the 100-acre portion of the existing mine located on Ute <br />Mountain Ute owned land Specifically, monitoring has found that some subsidence fractures <br />appeazed about 6 months after pillar extraction began. Cracks ran for a distance of about 200 feet <br />where overburden depths ranged from 100 feet (drainage ways) up to 300 feet (ridge togs) and <br />tended to follow the contour of the surface topography. They opened as much as 6 to 12 inches wide <br />ano `~ Ieet deep wltll most evident Cracks` betng VII ui6 Sidc SiopeS- Fro St-li.°,a:`litg and Sediment <br />• deposition reduced crack size to 1 to 2 inches within 12 months after they first appeared. There was <br />no apparent change in ground elevation or land use. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.