My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL50225
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL50225
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:33:15 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:47:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/25/1999
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR SL3
From
Phase II & III
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
review of ground water impacts is documented in a memorandum to file SL-03 dated March 25, <br />1999. The Division's review identified the following hydrolo;ic impacts. <br />Surface Water Impacts: <br />Hayden Gulch Nline has desraded the quality of water Flowing in the stream channel of <br />Hayden Gulch within one mile downstream from the mine. This conclusion is based on <br />a comparison of pre-minins and post-mining water quality data <br />2. The degradation in Hayden Gulch is an approximate 400 mg11 increase in total dissolved <br />solids (TDS) during springtime flow. The increase has raised TDS from a premining <br />level of azound 1000 mg/l, to a postmining level of around 1400 mg/l. <br />3. The degradation in Hayden Gulch will persist for hundreds to thousands of years before <br />returning to pre-mining levels. This projection is based on an analogy with a U.S. <br />Geological Survey geochemical mass-balance study at the nearby Seneca II Mine. <br />The degradation increase in TDS in Hayden Gulch is due mainly to an increase in the <br />concentration of sulfate. The origin of the sulfate most likely is the oxidation of pyrite <br />in the spoil in the former pit. Spoil spring RSP-4 (next to County Road 53) and pond <br />HG-8 are both fed by water discharging from the pit, and both dtrectly discharge into the <br />Hayden Gulch stream. <br />5. The degradation in Hayden Gulch will not violate State or Federal surface water laws. <br />6. The degradation in Hayden Gulch will no[ constitute material damage in Hayden Gulch <br />because the quantity of water flowing in Hayden Gulch stream is inadequate to support <br />irrigation use and the quality of water in the stream has always been too poor for higher <br />level uses. The water flowing in Hayden Gulch will remain suitable for livestock <br />watering. There is a stock watering pond in Hayden Gulch. <br />The degradation in Hayden Gulch will not cause material damage downstream from <br />Hayden Gulch because of dilution from another stream, the East Fork of [he Williams <br />Fork River. Amass-balance calculation indicates the degradation in Hayden Gulch will <br />increase the TDS concentration in the East Fork less than 4% during periods of low flow. <br />This increase is the same amount predicted in the mining and reclamation permit's <br />discussion of the probable hydrologic consequences. <br />Ground Water Impacts: <br />8. Amass-balance analysis indicates that sulfate-rich water discharging from the reclaimed <br />Hayden Gulch pit will not degrade ground water because virtually all of the water from <br />the pit dischazges into the surface waters of Hayden Gulch via spoil spring RSP-4 and <br />Hayden Gulch Mine Page 13 May 25. 1999 <br />Phase II/III Bond Release <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.