My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL50212
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL50212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:33:09 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:47:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978287
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/21/1992
Doc Name
VADER READY MIX PIT 78-287 OPERATORS RESPONSE TO SIGN & BOUNDARY MARKER CONCERNS EXPRESSED IN DIV
From
MLRD
To
VALCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STAT~OF C 1. <br />U Vtcxliv <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St.. Room 215 <br />Denver. CO 80203 <br />303 8663567 <br />FAX~303 832-8106 <br />oll °'o <br />~~:_-- ~q <br />Nei' `~ <br />.~, <br />.L~~• <br />~ /876 <br />Roy Romer. <br />Governor <br />Michael B. Long, <br />Drvison Drtector <br />April 21, 1992 <br />Mr. George Gregg, General Manager <br />Valco-Gunnison Concrete Division <br />P.O. Box 837 <br />Gunnison, CO 81230 <br />Re: Vader, Rozman, and Gunnison Ready Mix Pits (Permits M-78-287, M-81-014, <br />M-77-023) Operators' Response to Sign and Boundary Marker Concerns <br />Expressed in Division Inspection Reports of 3/12/92 <br />Dear Mr. Gregg: <br />The above-referenced response has been received by the Division. Thank you <br />for your prompt attention to the matter. <br />In regard to Problem 3 in the Gunnison Pit Inspection Report, I apparently was <br />premature in mentioning product stockpiles. The Division is attempting to <br />secure a policy decision from the Mined Land Reclamation Board in regard to <br />bonding for these. Until that decision is made, you may eliminate product <br />stockpiles from the requested amendment together with any estimated cost of <br />reclamation or attendant bonding. Modifying the reclamation plan in your <br />permit and increasing the bond, if necessary, to provide for reclamation of <br />the buildings and facilities in the office area, however, should still be done. <br />If you have any questions on the above, please contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />James C. Stevens <br />Senior Reclamation Specialist <br />JCS/bjw <br />2668E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.