My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL50193
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL50193
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:32:53 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:46:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977376
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
NOTICE OF HEARING ON DEBTORS MOTION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO USE PROPERTY OF ESTATE OUTSIDE ORDINARY COU
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B. Remcor Need Not be Employed Pursuant to the Terms of <br />Bankruptcy Code Section 327 <br />Section 327 (a) requires that "professional persons" may be <br />employed by a debtor's estate with court approval. "Professional <br />persons" is a bankruptcy term of art; although examples of <br />professional persons are listed in Section 327, this list is <br />probably not intended to be exhaustive. <br />At least one case has held that engineering firms are not <br />the type of professionals who require court approval for their <br />employment. In re Seatrain Lines, Inc., 13 Bankr. 980 (Bankr. <br />S.D.N.Y. 1981). In Seatrain, a frequently cited and followed <br />opinion, the court held that maritime engineers which the debtor <br />in possession wished to retain as consultants were not <br />professionals who required court approval. In so holding, the <br />court set forth a benchmark test for employment of professionals <br />under Section 327(a). The court stated that for purposes of <br />section 327(a), professional persons is limited to persons in <br />those occupations which play a central role in the administration <br />of the debtor proceeding. Id. at 981. This test was followed by <br />the court in In re Johns-Manville Coro., 60 Bankr. 612 (Bankr. <br />S.D.N.Y. 1986) in holding that lobbyists were not professionals <br />requiring employment under the terms of section 327 and by the <br />court in In re Fretheim, 102 Bankr. 298 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1989) in <br />holding that surveyors did not require employment under section <br />327. <br />5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.