My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL50193
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL50193
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:32:53 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:46:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977376
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
NOTICE OF HEARING ON DEBTORS MOTION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO USE PROPERTY OF ESTATE OUTSIDE ORDINARY COU
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FACTS <br />The facts set forth in the Motion for Authorization 'to Use <br />Property of the Estate Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 363 is <br />incorporz.ted herein by this reference. <br />LEGAL DISCIISSION <br />A. <br />Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code grants the debtor in <br />possession the right to manage the ongoing affairs of an <br />enterpri:;e operating under the protection of chapter 11. That <br />section F~ermits a debtor to use, sell or lease property in the <br />ordinary course of business. If a debtor proposes to use, sell <br />or lease property outside the ordinary course of business, <br />however, notice and a hearing on the proposal is required. 11 <br />U.S.C. § 363(b). <br />The term "ordinary course of business" is not defined in the <br />Bankruptcy Code, but rather the term has taken shape through <br />judicial interpretation. Most courts have held that the standard <br />of ordinz~ry course of business is fact sensitive but at the same <br />time, courts have developed some guidelines. A good articulation <br />of the guidelines is contained in Burlington Northern Railroad <br />Co. V. Dant & Russell. Inc., 853 F.2d 700 (9th Cir. 1988). In <br />that case, the Ninth Circuit emphasizes what has become known in <br />the case law as the (1) vertical dimension or creditor's <br />expectation test and (2) horizontal dimension test or industry <br />Z <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.