Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Davis O'Connor <br />July 5, ]994 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />4. ile were assured that the afr shaft installstlan~woald be done <br />to have ~ini.ua iapact on our property and tbe.aelq>ibors, i.e., <br />lastallation of silencing devices, rtc:, tenors arooad the <br />site, good cattle yuarde,.'etc:~"~jti:oi..theae reOrearntationa <br />have ~rovan to be untrue. <br />5. My asdertion that we receivad ~ cfs of rater out of the <br />consolidated Ditch has been conliraied in deposition by an <br />esployee of the Defendant. Me were alrays aQsti!!ed by tha <br />dishonaaty In this utter ainca not only did the Detasdant get <br />the air shaft installed, they also received 3 atr of water that <br />re owned is Na~trell t9 vhieb tram that for ~Drtanbsat -oars. np <br />absolutely nothing in the daa2 s:arpt tMir ctadibility ar it <br />turned out. . <br />6. lour predecessor did oflar to tattle ths.19li, rates ex-.. <br />change natter after it'bscaaMi abiolutelf obvious. tl~at'•tM ''~ ';y <br />Defendant would find it isposaible.to continue to daey that tha <br />deal was done in 19~t. I will not agree to settle this care • <br />piece-~ssal. I rant the fury to rra this pattara ot~dacrit.end <br />dishonesty that psrvadas .this eaie on the part of .tM"Drtaaidant . <br />7. I have now hnd to file another suit because of coal and coal <br />dust pollution. 'ibis again was necessary becawe ol~Ybe blatant <br />di.ahonesty and dferegard.lor. the rights o! others ditplaysd.hy <br />your client. lb their credit they aor seas to. be.ttyinq to <br />behave is a decent fashion, but why in the hell did it take <br />a lawsuit to a~alce than conduct thMSalves decently? <br />.. <br />