Laserfiche WebLink
<br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />131 3 Sherman 51.. Room 21 5 <br />Denver, Coloradu 80203 <br />Phone: 13031 8663567 <br />FA\: 1303) 832-8106 <br />RFf;FIVED <br />DEC 0 5 1995 <br />Division of mtlnelais n Ueolony <br />MINING PERMIT -COAL <br />lames 5 Lochhead <br />Enecuove Duecmr <br />Permit Date: October 4, 1994 <br />Permit No. C-84-062 <br />Permit Expiration Date: October 4, 1999 <br />~~ <br />II~~~ <br />DPPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Director <br />THIS PERMIT is issued by the Division of Minerals and Geology, Department of Natural Resources, <br />State of Colorado. <br />RECITALS <br />I. Colorado Yampa Coal Co. ("operator") desires to conduct a mining operation known as the <br />Energy Mine No. 3 for the purpose of extracting coal. <br />II. On October 23, 1995 the Division of Minerals and Geology ("the Division") approved the <br />operator's application for this permit, fixed the amount of bond and directed that this permit <br />be issued upon the filing with the Division of bond in the amount so fixed in form and <br />substance approved by the Division, and such bond has been so furnished. <br />III. On July 12, 1995, the Division made the following findings: <br />(a) The permit application is accurate and contains all information required under C.R.S., <br />34-33-101 et sec .and regulations promulgated thereunder and that all the requirements <br />of Article 33 of Title 34, C.R.S. ("such article") for the issue of a permit have been <br />complied with; <br />(b) The applicant has demonstrated that reclamation as required by such article can be <br />accomplished under the reclamation plan contained in the permit application; <br />(c) The assessment of the probable cumulative impact of all anticipated mining in the area <br />on the hydrologic balance specified in Section 34-33-110(2)(1) has been made by the <br />Division and the proposed operation thereof has been designed to prevent material <br />damage to the hydrologic balance outside the permit area; <br />(d) Granting the permit will not conflict with any designation decision issued pursuant to <br />Section 522 of the Federal "Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977," as <br />amended, (P.L. 95-87), nor is the area proposed to be mined within an area under <br />study for unsuitability designation in an administrative proceeding commenced pursuant <br />to Section 34-33-126 or Section 522 of said P.L. 95-87. <br />