Laserfiche WebLink
<br />There is no indication of past or current flood irrigation of these areas along Middle Creek and the <br />geomorphic characteristics of this area would not lend themselves to the development of an irrigation <br />system. Based on [he lack of flood irrigation potential, the narrow and incised nature of the valley <br />bottom, and the lack of meaningful differences between the creekside and upland vegetative <br />communities, the Division has determined that areas upstream of the Connel ditch lateral crossing of <br />Middle Creek, as shown on Map I5, are not alluvial valley floors. In this case, the extent of farmable <br />acreage would be 10 acres or less. The areas are not presently and have not historically been farmed <br />and evidence presented indicates that farming is not typically practiced on similar parcels in the region. <br />A previous negative determination had already been made for those lands along Middle Creek <br />downstream from the Counry Road No. 33 in section 12 to the first irrigation ditch crossing (Connel <br />ditch lateral). <br />Effects ofMining_gn identified Alluvial Vallev Floors <br />Due to elevated levels of salinity documented in current and future mine discharge water and potential <br />inhibitory effects of increased soil and alluvial ground water salinity on flood irrigated and subitrigated <br />crops, the potential for material damage caused by salt loading was a major concern which had to be <br />evaluated for each of the AVF's identified above. <br />Material damage projections were calculated in both asub-irrigation and a flood irrigation case <br />analysis, using data obtained during low-flow-of-record years. The subirrigation scenario assumed that <br />the stream would recharge the alluvial aquifer in the spring during peak flows. The flood irrigation <br />case utilized the period between June 1 and August 3 ] . Assumptions and equations used in projecting <br />water quality impacts are discussed in the Yampa River CHIA, which is on file at the Division office. <br />Salt loading projections were arrived at by stream flow modeling and analysis of past monitoring <br />results and projected dewatering activities. <br />In the supplemental information package dated September 22, 1986, the applicant submitted <br />information on vegetation cover and production by species for flood irrigated and sub-irrigated <br />croplands on the affected alluvial valley floors. Alluvial bodies, irrigated fields and vegetation sample <br />locations are depicted on supplemental Map No. 1 "Twentymile Park Salt Loading Study Land Use and <br />Hydrologic -Boundaries." This and other information was used by the Division to make the required <br />findings with regard to material damage. <br />Required findings for identified alluvial valley floors on Fish Creek, Trout Creek, and Foidel <br />Creek/Middle Creek confluence are presented separately below. <br />Fish reek <br />The boundaries of the f ish Creek alluvial valley floor are as delineated on Map No. I S of the Foidel <br />Creek Life of Mine application and include all alluvial deposits within and downstream from the <br />proposed permit area as delineated on supplemental Map No. I. Information discussed below has <br />reaffirmed the Division's original determination that alluvial deposits on Fish Creek meet alluvial valley <br />floor criteria based on existing flood irrigation, potential for flood irrigation and subirrigation. <br />The existence of a currently Flood irrigated field on lower Fish Creek and the presence of diversion <br />structures and irrigation ditches on various stream segments as delineated on Map 1 S document [he <br />potential for flood irrigation. <br />21 <br />