My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL49886
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL49886
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:29:41 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:30:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/19/1999
Doc Name
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CHAPTER 5 6 & 7
From
STEIGERS CORP
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br />i CRAPTERFIVE cummative ~muacts <br />5.9 WETLANDS <br />Cumulative effects would occw if two or more projects had a net reduction in wetland azea or <br />quality, resulting in a regional decline in wetlands. Construction of the CIG, TransColorado and <br />Yankee Gulch pipelines would distwb wetland vegetation and soils, but the effects would be <br />temporary. Groundwater pumping for the White River Nahcolite Project may cause a slight <br />decrease in wetland area in Yellow Creek in dry yeazs, but the affected area is less than 1 acre. <br />No cumulative impacts would occw to wetlands. <br />5.10 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES <br />Cumulative effects may occw where projects would adversely affect the same species and lead to <br />a cumulative reduction on populations or in habitat quantity or quality. Species which would be <br />affected by two or more projects include sage grouse and Colorado River endangered fish. <br />The Yankee Gulch, TransColorado, and CIG projects all would (or have) affected sage grouse. <br />The TransColorado Pipeline would affect 2 leks, which may lead to local population declines. <br />The CIG project has already affected the same leks as would be affected by the Yankee Gulch <br />pipeline corridor. The Stewart lek has moved into the CIG ROW since construction. These three <br />' projects could have a cumulative adverse effect on sage grouse, which are declining throughout <br />the Piceance Basin. <br />The White River Nahcolite Project and the Yankee Gulch Project both involve depletions <br />(consumptive use of water for processing) from the Colorado River system. Although this is a <br />cumulative impact, it is mitigated by depletion compensation required under the Endangered <br />Species Act and the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. <br />5.11 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES <br />Distwbance and/or loss of unidentified cultwal sites or paleontological localities could add to the <br />cumulative loss of information about ow heritage in the BLM White River Resowce Area and <br />' throughout the region if these resowces aze not properly identified, inventoried, and/or <br />appropriately protected prior to distwbance. However, such losses are not expected since <br />mitigation measwes as identified in Section 4.11.3 would be implemented under all proposed <br />' and potential futwe regional projects. <br />5.12 LAND USE AND RECREATION <br />Cumulative projects examined in this analysis include the White River Nahcolite Project, the <br />' TransColorado and Colorado Interstate Gas pipelines, and the Colorado Oil and Gas Leasing and <br />Development Project. All of the cumulative projects were issued special use permits by the local <br />counties and the BLM and are in conformance with land use policies of the counties and the <br />' BLM. White River Nahcolite is located about 1.5 miles from the southwest corner of the Yankee <br />Gulch lease azea. Together with the Yankee Gulch project the two facilities have dedicated land <br />to an industrial land use that precludes other uses in azeas where permanent (life of project) <br />facilities aze, or would be built. Hunting opportunities in the vicinity of the project azeas would <br />i be reduced, as would the grazing capacity of the Squaze S Allotment. None of these potential <br />5-7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.