My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL49846
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL49846
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:29:38 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:28:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977342
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/20/2002
Doc Name
Clarification Letter for Reclamation Cost Estimate
From
Climax Molybdenum Company
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />3.11 General Issue: Indirect Costs <br />CMC and Henderson have decades of experience with engineering design, bid <br />preparation, and contracting and contract management. Consequently, <br />Henderson does not understand the rationale behind DMG's standard two <br />percent surcharge for engineering work and/or contract/bid preparation. Likewise, <br />Henderson questions the statutory authority to attach this additional fee when <br />Section 4.2.1(5) of the Mineral Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board for hard Rock, Metal and Designated Mining Operations <br />(Rules) states only that "The Financial Warranty amount shall include an amount <br />equal to five (5%) percent of the amount of the cost of reclamation to defray the <br />administrative costs incurred by the Office in conducting reclamation". Henderson <br />is not questioning this five percent attachment. <br />Normally, these indirect costs are considered part of project management and <br />administration. The five percent line item for management and administration <br />should easily cover the engineering/contract/bid components. While it is <br />Henderson's experience that five percent is somewhat high, Henderson has no <br />objection to it. However, Henderson strongly believes that the two percent <br />surcharge should be eliminated from the total FW for the Henderson site. <br />4.0 FINANCIAL WARRANTY REVISION SUMMARY <br />Approval of this clarifications report will refine the FW cost calculations in a number <br />of areas and will result in a total FW reduction for clarification changes of <br />$12,524,215. As previously stated, Henderson submitted TR-12 to closely <br />precede these additional non-TR clarifications. A Henderson spreadsheet, <br />incorporating the changes proposed in both TR-12 and this clarifications report, <br />including indirect cost percentages of direct totals, is presented in Exhibit K. The <br />total FW based on Henderson's calculations is $22,989,782. The total reduction <br />from DMG's initial estimate of $54,695,000 is $31,705,218. This total represents <br />an increase in Henderson's current FW of $12, 856, 782. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.