My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL49575
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL49575
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:29:02 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:13:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/19/1999
Doc Name
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CHAPTER 2
From
STIEGERS CORP
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TABLE 2-9 <br />IMPACT SUMMARY <br />:: <br />p . .. ......:...:..:::...: ............:......: <br />. . <br />Atcelaiateii:llevel@,..tnei!~'::::::.:: ;.:s:.::::.::.:.:...:.: <br />, <br />, <br />':'T eolPoteiitial:Im ertti Resource :.; <br />Yp . .................p......Y.:..:..:.:.....:.: :: :::. ::Pieeanca:Site.:::.:':::::::; Pf aline'.::.:::::::::;.; . xrachuEdSite ::::: <br />:.. P ..:...:...:...:::.P.....:.....:........:..:... -.::.;.: <br />........P.leeance.:5ite.'::'.':.! :.:::.:;::: <br />:::.:.;.;Pipeilna : .::.: .:::::.'.::: ,:::::CaraciiitteSite':. ;:;': <br />• Increased water consumption Hydrostatic test water hydrostatic test water I, I58 ac-R per year Same as Proposed Same as Proposed 3,475 ac-R per year <br /> taken in priority front taken from Colorado of water from the Action Action obtained using <br /> Piceanee Creek. River under an Colorado River and existing water right on <br /> existing water right. alluvial groundwater Colorado River; <br /> wells under an Section 7 consultation <br /> existing water right; required (or depletion. <br /> Section 7 <br /> consullalioit required <br /> Ibr Colorado River <br /> depletion. <br /> <br /> <br />:.::::::.:..:::.::..:.::.:.:..::........:.........:.:. ...........:.....:. . <br /> <br />:...:.....:.......:.................::.::........... row <br />~a.... <br />ter <br />• Degradation of groundwater quality No significant impacts Same as Proposed Same as Proposed Same as Proposed Same as Proposed Same as Proposed <br />from accidental releases of high TDS anticipated given Action Action Action Action Action <br />production Fluids or wastewater protective design <br /> measures and leak <br /> detection monitoring <br /> and response <br /> progran[s <br />• Subsidence could enhance fracture Could increase rate of No effect No effect Same a, Proposed No effect No elTect <br />permeability and allow grotndwater to TDS plume migration; Action <br />be conducted at greater rates both subsidence monitoring <br />vertically and horizontally would he conducted <br /> <br />Sheet 2 of l2 <br />~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.