Laserfiche WebLink
CNAPTERTWO Proposed Action and Alternatives <br />The number of workers for both the construction and operation phases, and for each project <br />component is shown on Table 2-6. <br />2.3.3.6 Transportation <br />Truck and commuter traffic associated with the Accelerated Development Alternative would <br />correspond with the increased level of employment, both during the construction and operations <br />phases. During the 18-month construction phase, vehicle trips to both sites would roughly <br />double to a peak of approximately 470 commuter trips expected daily. For the pipeline <br />construction, commuter trips would amount to approximately 100 trips per day, which is the <br />same as described for the Proposed Action (Table 2-7). The origins of these commuter trips <br />would be distributed among the local communities in the project azea from both Rio Blanco and <br />Gazfield Counties, as described for the Proposed Action. <br />Truck trips during the construction phase would similazly increase to an estimated 208 per day <br />during the peak of construction activity. <br />During the operations phase, increased project staffing would also be expected t~~ increase <br />commuter trips to approximately 230 trips daily. Truck trips aze estimated to tota162 trips per <br />day under the Accelerated Development Alternative. <br />It is estimated that rail traffic would increase to about 93 100-ton rail cars per day, 5 days per <br />week, or 465 cazs per week. American Soda would run three trains per day each hauling about <br />31 cazs down the rail spw to the Union Pacific main line. <br />2.4 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE <br />The No Action Alternative evaluates impacts that would occw in the event the ~~ankee Gulch <br />Project Commercial Mine Plan was not approved. Disapproval of the Mine Plan. would occw if <br />the impact analysis in this EIS and the subsequent ROD concluded that the Proposed Action <br />would result in undue and unnecessary degradation, which is prohibited by 43 CFR 3809. <br />Acceptable impacts include the reasonable and necessary degradation associated with the <br />distwbance required for the extraction and processing of minerals. <br />Under the No Action Alternative, American Soda would not receive approval to develop the <br />Yankee Gulch Project; solution mining wells, pipelines, and associated processing facilities <br />would not be developed; and proven nahcolite reserves in the area would remain undeveloped. <br />As such, the opportunity to develop mineral resowces, as authorized by law, woiild be foregone <br />on Federal lands. The project could not be developed in a feasible manner without the use of <br />Federal (BLM) lands. <br />Under the No Action Alternative, ongoing mining activities under the existing E:Kploration Plan <br />and Test Mine Plan could continue under the terms of their existing approvals, but in all <br />likelihood these activities would cease if there was no prospect of commercial mine <br />development. In this case, workers currently employed by American Soda would subsequently <br />be laid off, and, after closwe of the Test Mine, various existing facilities such as the control <br />building, solution mining wells, piping, and ponds would be dismantled and the rite would be <br />reclaimed. No modifications to the Unocal refinery would take place. <br />2-34 <br />