Laserfiche WebLink
' CNAPTERTWO Proposed Action and AlternaWes <br />the Pazachute Site, access by the same pipeline construction workers would be via Parachute <br />Creek Road from the town of Pazachute and then dirt access roads to the pipe]ine route itself. <br />Current American Soda employees reside in Meeker, Rangely, Rifle, Glenwood Springs, <br />' Pazachute, and Battlement Mesa, and it is expected that future hires would also reside in these <br />communities, but future hires could reside as faz away as Grand Junction. <br />It is estimated that rail traffic would be one train trip per day of about 26 100-ton rail cars, 5 days <br />per week, or 130 cazs per week. Along the Union Pacific main line, rail traffic would increase <br />from about 24 trains per week to 27 trains with the proposed project. <br />2.2.5 Mitigation and Monitoring Programs <br />' During Yankee Gulch Project operations, several monitoring programs would be implemented, <br />including: <br />• Solution Mining Well Monitoring <br />• Subsidence Monitoring <br />• Groundwater Quality and Water Level Monitoring <br />• Evaporation Pond Monitoring <br />• Air Emission Source Monitoring <br />' • Wildlife Recovery and Replacement Plan <br />Solution mining well monitoring, surface subsidence monitoring, and groundwater monitoring <br />' aze only applicable to the Piceance Site. Evaporation pond monitoring and air emission source <br />monitoring programs would be developed for both the Piceance Site and the Pazachute Site. <br />2.2.5.1 Solution Mining Well Monitoring <br />A solution mining well monitoring program would be developed prior to the ROD and <br />implemented in accordance with the requirements of BLM, CDMG, and the US Environmental <br />Protection Agency (EPA) Class III Underground Injection Control (UiC) Area Permit for the <br />' project. The monitoring plan would be finalized once the UIC permit is issued and would be <br />established to ensure that solution mining activities would not cause the movement of fluids into <br />any Underground Source of Drinking Water (USDW). Furthermore, the monitoring program <br />' would be implemented to help ensure compliance with Colorado Statute 25-8-102(2). A portion <br />of this statute states that it is the public policy of the state to conserve state waters and to protect, <br />maintain and improve where necessary and reasonable, the quality thereof for public water <br />supplies, for protection and propagation of wildlife and aquatic life, for domestic, agricultural <br />industrial and recreational uses and for other beneficial uses. The statute also provides that no <br />pollutant be released into any state waters without first receiving the treatment or other corrective <br />' action to reasonably protect the legitimate and beneficial uses. <br />' 2-19 <br />