My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL49575
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL49575
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:29:02 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:13:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/19/1999
Doc Name
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CHAPTER 2
From
STIEGERS CORP
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CNAPTERTW O Proposed Action and Alternatives <br />' This chapter describes the Proposed Action submitted by American Soda and alternatives to this <br />action, including a No Action Altemative. The Proposed Action is to construct and operate a <br />commercial solution mine producing 1.4 million tons per yeaz (tpy) of nahcolite that would <br />subsequently be processed into soda ash and sodium bicazbonate. In addition, two <br />subaltetnatives have been considered for natural gas lines that would serve the Piceance Site. <br />The Accelerated Development Altemative is similaz to the Proposed Action, except that the <br />proposed mining operations would be completed in ] 0 yeazs rather than 30 yeazs. The No <br />Action Altemative would deny American Soda's permit application as currently proposed to <br />develop the Yankee Gulch Joint Venture Leases for nahcolite solution mining. <br />' American Soda has evaluated a number of potential designs and configurations for the project. <br />Most of the altematives identified were eliminated from further consideration due to the potential <br />for greater environmental impacts, technical infeasibility, or economic infeasibility. This chapter <br />f contains a summary of the potential envirotmental effects of each of the reasonable altematives <br />and identifies the Bureau of Land Management's (BEM's) preferred altemative. <br />2.1 OVERVIEW <br />The Yankee Gulch Project Area is located in western Colorado north of the Interstate <br />70/Colorado River corridor (Figure 1-1). The Project Area extends from the Piceance Site south- <br />southeast to the Pazachute Site for a distance of approximately 43.4 miles. The Piceance Site is <br />' located approximately 22 miles southwest of Meeker, Colorado, in Rio Blanco County on the <br />Yankee Gulch Joint Venture Leases. The Piceance Site occupies portions ofT1S, R97W, <br />Sections I S through 22, 28, and 29 of the Sixth Principal Meridian. The pipeline corridor is <br />' approximately 43.4 miles long and extends from within the Piceance Site to the Pazachute Site. <br />The Pazachute Site is located approximately 2.5 miles northwest of the town of Pazachute, <br />Colorado, in Garfield County, and would occupy the former Unocal facility in the southern half <br />of T6S, R96W and the northern half of T7S, R96W. <br />American Soda is currently conducting limited exploration drilling and experimental solution <br />t mining activities at the Piceance Site under previously permitted plans (Exploration Plan, BLM <br />approved December 1996; Test Mine Plan, BLM approved May 1997). The exploration program <br />is providing site-specific information on geologic and hydrogeologic conditions and data on <br />chemical and physical chazacteristics of the nahcolite mineral resources. The experimental <br />solution mining program is providing data on the feasibility of vertical cavity solution mining of <br />nahcolite and experience with the actual performance of equipment in extracting and processing <br />' nahcolite. <br />The experimental test mine facility occupies 13 acres and is located in the north-central portion <br />of the Piceance Creek Basin in T1S, R97W, Sections 20, 21, and 29. If the Proposed Action is <br />approved, the experimental test mine facility would be retained and operated in a research <br />capacity. However, mining solutions from this facility would be routed to the normal processing <br />stream along with solutions from the main commercial production. The existing <br />cooling/retention ponds would remain in place and would be used for emergency storage in the <br />event that the well field piping needed to be drained. The existing experimental test mine <br />' facilities would remain in place for the life of the project. <br />' 2] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.