My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL49311
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL49311
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:27:58 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:00:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/25/1982
Doc Name
COLO WESTMORELAND PHASE 2 SURFACE HYDROLOGIC STUDY STIPULATION 13 DRAINAGE REVIEW ORCHARD VALLEY
From
MLR
To
SANDY EMRICH
Permit Index Doc Type
STIPULATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Sandy Emrich -2- June 25, 1982 <br />Another area not discussed is the possibility of lining the ditch with impervious <br />material. Should mass wasted material block the ditch during a heavy runoff <br />event, a small impoundment would form. If the ditch were lined with impervious <br />material (asphalt, clay, hypalon), the hazard of fill saturation would be greatly <br />reduced. <br />Colorado Westmoreland should consider the following items when presenting a <br />plan for improvement of this ditch: <br />1) Stability concerns, <br />2) Minimizing additional disturbance, <br />3) Vegetative cover on the coZluvial cut slopes, and <br />4) Ditch lining. <br />The second recommendation provided by dferrick & Co. is to install an auxiliary <br />diversion channel. Should this auxiliary diversion become part of a proposal by <br />Colorado Westmoreland, sufficient design information should be provided to show <br />that the culvert (2Z" cmp) will pass the 10-year, 29-hour storm peak flow. A <br />small area exemption should be applied for for the area no longer served by <br />the sediment control system (Rule 4.05.2(3)). <br />Other Benches: <br />The Division has no concern regarding the recommendation for the regrading of <br />the ditch on the Portal Bench to drain to Node 4. This action should be under- <br />taken as soon as possible. <br />It is not clear what is intended by the first recommendation Listed under <br />Crushing and Screening Level Fill of the Fferrick & Co. report. Amore thorough <br />discussion of the effects cahich pipe Df has on this fill should be provided. The <br />second recommended action should be undertaken as soon as possible. <br />waste Rock Pile: <br />The Division concurs with the Merrick 6 Co. report that the location of the waste <br />rock pile should not interfere with natural drainage patterns. <br />Reclaimed Facilities: <br />There is not enough information given to formulate review. <br />/mt <br />w <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.