My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL49262
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL49262
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:27:52 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 4:58:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/27/1994
Doc Name
REVIEW IRONCLAD MILL TAILING RESLTS OF CYANIDE DETOXIFICATION ASSESSMENT
From
DMG
To
BERHAN KEFFELEW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Review: "Ironclad Mill Tailings; Results of Cyanide Detox" <br />Memo to B. Keffelew, June 27, 1994 <br />Page 3 <br />3. The MSDS for Ca-hypochlorite recommends evacuation within a 5000 foot radius if <br />uncontrollable fire results. If Ca-hypochlorite is to be used on site, its handling, storage <br />and emergency contingencies need to be incorporated by the Environmental Protection <br />Plan. <br />4. Even though there seems to be less cyanide in the upper parts of the pile than deeper, <br />and even though the plan is to remove material preferentially from the upper parts of the <br />tailings pile, there appears to be no relationship between original cyanide concentration <br />(in mg/kg) and the amount remaining after treatment (in mg/L). Thus, is it really useful <br />to concentrate on the upper part of the pile? <br />5. WAD data for BGA-ICA-7, samples 5-10 and S-11 are not included. Why? <br />6. Well numbers BGA-ICA 1 through 5 were drilled prior to the Division's review of <br />Amendment #6 and prior to the generation of the Commitments that resulted from the <br />Divison's approval of the Amendment. Understandably, the data generated for that <br />submittal do not meet many of the criteria needed for the present submittal. 'However, <br />given the necessity of obtaining statistically significant information from wells BGA-ICA <br />6 and 7, which were drilled and tested specifically for the present submittal, there are <br />several curious data gaps. In particular, many of the samples were not analyzed for <br />cyanide under the MWMP testing program. It would be appropriate to explain why all <br />of the samples were not analyzed for WAD and Total cyanide during the MWMP testing. <br />7. In section 5, page 12-I5, is a generous discussion demonstrating that cyanide <br />concentrations are lower in the upper part of the tailings than the lower. The section <br />pays a particular amount of attention to the cyanide concentrations in the tailings above <br />24 ft depth. In Section 6, it is stated that only the upper part of the Ironclad tailings will <br />be put to use, and that the concentration of cyanide in the useable portion will be less <br />than 2.0 mg/L WAD cyanide. <br />The average depth of drill holes in the Ironclad tailings is about 80 feet, plus or minus <br />a few feet; presumably, 80 ft is about the average thickness of the Ironclad tailings. The <br />volume of Iron Clad tailings is about 576,000 yd3. The amount needed for liner material <br />is 69 % of that, or 396,000 yd'. If 396,000 yd' of tailings is needed from a 576,000 yd', <br />80 ft thick, vertical-walled pile of tailings (i.e. 69%), then the pile would need to be <br />excavated to a depth of 55 ft. Provided the pile has sloping sides, which it does, the <br />depth of excavation would be deeper. Therefore, it is without merit to state that the <br />concentration of cyanide in the useable portion of the tailings will be lower than 2 mg/L <br />WAD cyanide. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.