My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL49235
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL49235
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:27:46 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 4:57:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/23/1993
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR RN2
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
On November 5, 1987, Colorado Westmoreland Inc.'s application for renewal of a <br />valid and existing permit to conduct coal mining operations, Permit No. <br />C-038-83, was deemed complete. The Division published its proposed decision <br />to approve the revision with ten stipulations on August 4, 1988, and amended <br />the permit decision of March 21, 1983 by renumbering the permit as C-81-038 to <br />ensure consistency within the MLRD files. Permit C-81-038 was issued by the <br />Division on July 21, 1988. This date was in error; the permit issuance should <br />have been back-dated to April 20, 1988. (We will remedy this situation by <br />correcting the decision date of this permit renewal from July 21, 1983 to <br />April 20, 1993.) <br />The Division issued a decision on August 10, 1989 to approve the transfer of <br />mining permit C-81-038 from Colorado Westmoreland Inc. to Cyprus Orchard <br />Valley Coal Corporation. <br />This "Findings of. Compliance" document has been updated to reflect existing <br />conditions and issues discussed during the 1993 permit renewal process. <br />These issues were summarized in the Preliminary Adequacy Review letter of <br />March 19, 1993. COVCC's adequacy responses were received by the Division on <br />June 4, 1993. Responses were in the form of commitments and a technical <br />revision. Details of these responses can be found within these renewal <br />findings. <br />This document contains the "Proposed Decision to Approve the Permit <br />Application," a description of the environment affected by the mining <br />operation and the reclamation plan, and the Division's written findings of <br />compliance as required by the Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act. <br />Detailed information concerning .the review process is on file at the Division <br />offices; legal requirements can be found in the Act and Regulations of the <br />Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for Coal Mining. All rules referenced <br />in this document are contained within the Regulations. Detailed information <br />about the proposed mining and reclamation operation can be found in the. permit <br />application on file (File No. C-038-83) in the public record maintained by the <br />Division, located in .Room 215, Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street, <br />Denver., Colorado 80203, telephone (303) 866-3567. Copies of the application <br />are also available for inspection at the Delta County Clerk and Recorder's <br />Office in Delta, Colorado. <br />Right of Successive Renewal <br />C.R.S 34-33-109(7) and Regulation 2.08.5 allow an operator to permit any lands <br />outside the five-year mine plan area with the right of successive permit <br />renewal. Cyprus Orchard Valley Coal Corporation has exercised this right. <br />The permit area for the Orchard Valley Mine that was included in the <br />application contains coal reserves projected to last to the year 2010. The <br />Division originally granted CWI approval to mine all of these lands (subject <br />to the attached conditions). However, the permit term will be divided into <br />five-year increments. At the end of each permit term, COVCC need only apply <br />for a permit renewal (along with responding adequately to any applicable <br />stipulations or conditions). In determining whether to approve or deny a <br />renewal, the burden shall be on the opponent of the renewal. <br />-8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.