Laserfiche WebLink
'' ~ ~ ~' <br />to come to its balance of life-forms under, hopefully, prudent management. <br />In preparing the ecosystem for development of this equilibrium, all the <br />major desirable species of woody and herbaceous plants practically avail- <br />able at the time should be returned in quantities which allow for the <br />potential increase of each species without limitation by the lack of a <br />seed source. <br />The proposed woody plant density standards as specified in the reclamation <br />plan would result in woody plants spaced a maximum average distance <br />apart of eleven feet in all directions. Intuitively, it seems apparenT <br />that with this spacing, were ecological conditions appropriate, all areas <br />would be within easy seed dispersal distance of potential parent plants. <br />In this manner, the revegetated area is stocked with appropriate species <br />and life-forms which can adjust their relative abundance to reflect the <br />competitive conditions existing under the post-mining land use. <br />By way of review, the proposed minimum woody plant revegetation standards <br />for the Munger Canyon Mine are as follows: Greasewood Shrubland, 350 <br />stems per acre; Big Sagebrush Shrubland, 480 shrubs per acre; and Pinyon- <br />Juniper Woodland, 1500 stems per acre. Note that between shrub seeding <br />and transplanting there is a good chance that densities could be much <br />higher than this, if site conditions are conducive. Also note that the <br />maximum effort toward establishment of high woody plant density is directed <br />toward Pinyon-Juniper Woodland where the woody component of the vegetation <br />is thought to represent the greatest value to the most types of wildlife. <br />Stipulation #13: Method/means for evaluation of woody plant density and species <br />diversity on reclaimed areas. MIRD and WRD discussed current thinking on <br />acceptable evaluation methods for density and diversity. WRD will submit a <br />discussion addressing this topic. <br />Response: The attached table lists the species present in the affected <br />area of each vegetation type, which provided over 3 percent relative cover. <br />It is suggested that these numbers of species by life-form be used as the <br />minimum stnadards for diversity in the post-mining revegetated areas of <br />each vegetation type. Because the vegetation of the site had been abused <br />by overgrazing for a long period prior to study, the vegetation composition <br />had been shifted in most of the vegetation types to the point where most of <br />the vegetation cover was provided by woody species and weedy annuals. <br />Reference to the seed mixes and live nursery stock transplant lists will <br />show that the revegetation effort is directed toward a considerably higher <br />species diversity and improved species composition than exists in the abused <br />existing vegetation. <br />Woody plant density standards for each vegetation type are proposed in the <br />reclamation plan and are explained under Stipulation #12 above. <br />-5- <br />