My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL49100
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL49100
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:27:11 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 4:51:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
CONTRACTOR CLAIMS
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The contractor was late by 7 days ($2100). <br />The Oct. 7 letter maintains the 7 day delay and the $2100 <br />amount. <br />D3 <br />Problem: Providing the seed on time, <br />The State (June 24) that the seed was provided- <br />Based on the June 24 and the Oct. 7 letter, I do not feel that <br />the contractor has provided sufficient evidence of delay. <br />~~ W 0~ h, v \' 9+n, /~~sL <br />PUNCH LIST <br />P1 <br />According to the Aug. 26 letter all of the punch list items <br />have been satisfied, except for the amount of rock in the <br />Chen's Hill ditch. <br />How much is that worth? <br />As of Oct. 7 this work had not been completed. <br />EXTRAS <br />E1 <br />i <br />On July 19 the contractor asked for $405 to build (a) water <br />bars at the extreme south end, (b) regrade an area in Magpie <br />Gulch and (c) build a small burm where the temporary road went <br />through. Also for (d) sloping the road towards the hill. <br />Who authorized all of that? <br />In a letter dated Aug. 26 the State contends that the road was <br />for the contractors convenience. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.