My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL48962
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL48962
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:26:45 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 4:45:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/24/2006
Doc Name
RMRS NTTT Aspen Study Proposal
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
June pre-dawn and afternoon water stress levels (Figures 8, 11) appeared to <br />be similar for all treatments. The data sugctest that pre-dawn water stress levels <br />as high as 14 bars, and afternoon water stress levels as high as 20-25 bars, <br />were not of sufficiently high levels to cause; enough stress to reduce survival of <br />these trees. <br />Moisture stress appeared to be less. with transplanted sprouts in the <br />irrigation experiment, including the un-irrig,ated controls, than with root sprouts, <br />potted plants, or natural sprouts in July and September (Figures 96 - 10B). It is <br />interesting to note that leaves appeared srnaller and terminal growth appeared <br />less on these apparent less-stressed transplanted trees (Figures 3 and 4), <br />suggesting that growth of root sprouts, potted plants, and natural sprouts was <br />not limited by the apparent higher moisture: stress levels they experienced. <br />Maximum leaf water potentials at mid-afternoon (Figure 11A, 11 B) found stress <br />levels of about 25 bars or less, levels that ,appeared unrelated to treatment, or <br />to growth and survival. <br />The growth data suggest that roto-cleared soil could have provided <br />additional nutrients or other benefits, perhaps mycorhizae, for tree growth. <br />Weed growth appeared greater on roto-cleared soil than dozer-cleared soil <br />(data not shown). Since we weeded around all monitored trees for this <br />experiment, weeds were not a competitor for the aspen in this study. <br />IV. Fencing -Fencing is necessary to obtain an adequate stand of aspen, <br />regardless of the sources of the trees. The unfenced Yoast site had severe <br />damage from ungulates (Table 1), including breakage of stems, browsing, and <br />rubbing damage. Most trees at this site hart some form of injury. Yet, growth <br />and survival of these trees was good (Figures 3B - 76), suggesting that the <br />undisturbed soil presence of an extensive parent root system is ideal for growth <br />of aspen. Nevertheless, fencing of these trees is recommended to produce an <br />adequate stand of mature aspen. <br />Conclusions: <br />I. Growth and survival did not appear to be related to irrigation treatment, likely <br />a consequence of the high rainfall during the 2005 growing season. <br />II. Best growth appeared to be on natural root segment sprouts on roto-cleared <br />soil. <br />III. Transplanted sprouts, regardless of irrigation treatment in this relatively wet <br />year, showed considerable transplant injury. Growth and survival was <br />relatively low and diseases were higher in transplant cutting plots. <br />IV. Potted aspen from nursery stock planted on dozer-cleared soil grew well. <br />V. Fencing is necessary to protect small aspen trees from browsing injury. <br />~o <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.