GENERAL48922

• Permit No: C1980001
• IBM Index Class Name: General Documents
• Doc Date: 10/29/1981
• Doc Name: Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
• Permit Index Doc Type: FINDINGS
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

• _~.. •
~:
C014PILATIOPI OF STIPULATIOPIS
1. WITHIN 60 DAYS OF FERMIT APPROVAL T1fE APPLICANT fv7LI, PROVIDE THE LOCATION,
EXTENT AND DESCRIPTION OF TlIE PROPOSED IIA]'DRO fII.STORIC DISTRICT. THE AREA
OF THE PROPOSED HAYBRO HISTORIC DISTRICT HILL BE AVOIDED AND PROTECTED UNTIL
SUCH TIME AS ITS FINAL GLIGIDILITY Is" DETE.RPfIF1E1).
2. WITHIN 1B0 DA k'S OF PERMIT ISSUANCE TlIE APPLZCArJT WILL CONDUCT A 1/2 ^1I LE
BUFFER ZONE SURVE k' AND SUD MIT THE REPORT. TI1F. SURVE]' CAN BE ACCOFIPL.iSHED 8Y
A LITERATURE SEARCII OR BS' ,1 RECONI/AISSANCE SlJRVF, 1' OI' AREAS TIIAT PfIGI1T BE
IMPACTED BY BLASTING. T}IE BUFFER zor/e SURVEY i1UST INCLUDE TrIE SITES
SRT 147-152 WHICH ARE FROPQSED FOR EJ,IGIDILITS' FOR THE FEDERAL REGISTER. A
DECLARATION OF NEGATIVE FINDINGS BF A CULTUR/lL RE.SOIIRCE PROFES.SIOCJAL ldAY BE
BASED ON THE EXISTIflG CULTURAL RESOURCE REPORTS, PRE['IOIlS ARCIIAEOLOGICA J,
SUP,VEY WORK DOME ICJ THE VICIilITS' O[' TflE ?FINE 6JITII SIffILi~R EtlVTP.OCfI-;EC/TAL
CO:VDITZONS OR LACK OI' 'TOPUGJLlP1IFC FE/1TURES TIfAT COUJ,D CONTAiiJ CULTUP.AL SITES.
J. [DITHIP! 90 D:13'S OF rJOTI FICATION OF TILE t IN,1L ET.JG iDIJ,IT}" FOP. !'71E A'ATIOCIAL
REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLICE.S FOR CIJLZ'URT.L RESOURCE .S LIES 5 RT 1=77-152 AllD TlfE
HAYBRO DISTRICT, THE APPLICANT SHALL .SCIAMZZ' A SIFT ISFiiCTORY PLAN TO MITIGATE
Ih1PACTS ON AN1' ELIGZDLE SITE.
9. THE APPLICA/T MUST P,E,S IlBF1IT TG idLRD THE DESIGNS /'OR' T.'fE idOFFAT ARE/1 SEDIMEVT
PONDS AT LEAST SIX FIO.NTH.S PRIOR TO CO"JSTRLICTION, AIJD Ri:CEZYE APPPOVAL FOR
THE PROPOSED DESIGN DEFORC Corlrle 'CIrIG COi15TRUCTIQN Of THE PONDS OR hILV7(iG IN
THE l~IOFFAT AREA. TIIESC DES'T(:rlS 41I LI, REFLECT CURRENT REGUI,/1 TOR}' GESZGP•'
CR ZTEP.IA AND APPROVAL f/TL(. BE CONTIrlGEi\'T O!: 11JF~)ItJ~IAT7/~:V DEJ~ION.ST.RATING TIIAT
THE PONDS OUTFLOW .'/ILL IdI;ET E!' IZli L''N'I' LL'?ITAT i 0iJ5.
48, PITTSBURG AI/D IdIDL•'A'J COi~L COC!PA lJ]' Z.S DIRECTED TO PIrEP,1 HE AiVD SIID^IIT, FOR APPROVAL
BY THE DIVISION, GEOTEC1IidIC:1 J, .1ND STAB II, ITY .l Nii Lk'.SES OF TILE FP.GPOSED hfOFFAT
AREA SEDIMF,CJT POr/D.S. Ti]ESE ANALYSES SlIOULD INC'LIi DG COId.S7 DERATIOA! OF BOTH
DEDROCK (BEDDING PLaIJE AliD .70ICiT INGJ AIJD SCIRFIL'7A 1. (RO'GITIONAL) i-0ATERIAL
FAILURE SCENARIOS, EFFECTS OF GROl,'ND f/ATER AND POTi UED SCIP.FACE ['/ATER UPON POIJD
SLOPE STAD LLITS', TlIE POTEiDTTAl, FOR CUT SCOPE F/i IT,URE.S :iBOL'E TfIE EXCA [%RTED
P0."J DS, AND THE STd DI LI1"i OF THE PZ;JAL RF,CLA I!4''C C~,iJFIG[1P.ATIOfJ. (STATIC SLOPE
SAFETY FACTORS OF 1.3 i4Cr.ST I:E :1TTAIN'ED FO.R RECD?L';ED COIJFIGURATIO."S.)
REPRESENT.I'TIVE "[DORST CASE" r1 ClALYSES ARE ACCEPT.%iDLE, IF GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSES
SHOE' THAT THE POND SITCI/1T70?!.S PURPORTED TO DE' REP,?EtiEi2TED ARE ANI~LOGOUS.
THE RESULTS OF THESE Ah'A.LI'S ES MOST DE APPROVGD Df' THE DIVISION PRIOR TO Tf?E
COi~1.'fEClCEMENT OF CONSTRUCT IO.?! OF ANY OF '1'IfE FIOFFAT :1RE:'i I'OiJDS.
4b. THE APPLICANT PfUST CONSTRUCT DIVERSION Di TCH l IP! TIlF r!OFFAT AP.EA TO ENSURE
THAT FL00r FROh1 THE DITCIi DOES CLOT OUTLET LVTO FOd1D 3. THE APPLICT,CIT r`fUST ALSO
PROVIDE EROS IOC! CONTROL AT TfIE DITCH C7UTLET T~~ PROTECT TfIE RECEIVIiJG DRirfD
FRO!•1 EROSION.
9c. THE APPLICANT SHALL SUB,`1IT DESIGN DATA FOR E:1CH OF TJIE FJOFI'AT AREA SEDIFIEI/TA-
TION POND INFLOfD DITCHES. T.'fI5 Ir1FORFIATIOCJ S1/i~LL ICJCLUDE EVIDENCE TIIAT DITCH
SLOPES WILL PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO THE PONDS WITH ACCEPTABLE VELOCITIES.
THE ZNFOR,+IATION SHOULD ALSO DEMONSTRATE TffAT DERAIS TO DE CO,VSTRUCTED WILL NOT
SIGNIFICAFITLY IM1IPOUlJD [DATER.