My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL48818
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL48818
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:25:57 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 4:35:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/20/1989
Doc Name
Memo on Abandonment of Underground Workings because of TC Status
From
MLRD
To
JIM STEVENS
Permit Index Doc Type
CESSATION OF OPERATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Jim Stevens <br />"7emporary Abandonment" of New Elk <br />page 2 <br />failure. He projects that this would make it extremely expensive and <br />hazardous to attempt to reopen dewatered underground workings within the New <br />Elk mine. <br />Deterioration of Underground Equipment <br />The acidity of the waters flooding the underground workings would <br />significantly degrade any plumbing, wiring or equipment not removed from the <br />underground workings prior to abandonment. Realistically, if abandonment <br />lasted more than a few months the operator would have to replumb and rewire <br />the entire underground workings. This would represent a significant expense. <br />Water puality Considerations <br />In the event that the operator decided to recommission the abandoned <br />underground workings, an enormous volume of possibly contaminated water would <br />have to be bailed from the flooded workings. Pumping rates would be high, <br />requiring the installation expensive pumps. I believe it is likely that all <br />of this water would require treatment prior to release, which would constitute <br />another significant expense and environmental concern. Treatment plants and <br />sedimentation ponds would need to be sized to permit rapid dewatering. This <br />would significantly exceed the size of steady state facilities required for <br />maintenance of current operating conditions. <br />Conclusion & Recommendation <br />Based upon this brief analysis, conducted with the benefit of discussion with <br />Joe Nugent of the Colorado Division of Mines, I do not believe it is realistic <br />to assume that the underground workings at the New Elk underground coal mine <br />could be recommissioned if they were "temporarily abandoned" and allowed to <br />flood. If Wyoming Fue]s Company wants to pursue "temporary abandonment" they <br />will have to provide sufficient information to demonstrate that it is prudent <br />to believe that the underground workings could be recommissioned, and that <br />"temporary abandonment" would not present a hazard to the environment or the <br />health and safety of the public. <br />Failing such a demonstration, and upon expiration of Temporary Cessation <br />status, Wyoming Fuels should be required to complete reclamation of all <br />facilities of the New Elk mine, in accordance with the approved permit. Any <br />existing IJew Elk mine facilities necessary for the operation of the <br />neighboring Golden Eagle mine should be included within the Golden Eagle mine <br />permit through revision. <br />cc: Mike Long <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.