My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL48692
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL48692
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:25:21 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 4:30:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-26- <br />Permit Araa <br />No significant effect on surface water quality in or adjacent to the permit <br />area will occur as a result of mining operations. Water quality in and <br />adjacent to the mining area is highly variable with primary constituents <br />of concern reflecting seasonal and precipitation- related trends. <br />TSS values show extreme fluctuations at Taylor, Wilson, and Good Spring <br />Creeks. Sediment yeild rates for the mine area using the Universal Soil <br />Loss Equation and a rainfall factor of 30.0 averaged 0.96 tons/acre/year <br />for the mine permit area. This average was broken down into`-the <br />component parts of undisturbc-d Sand and land being mined or in a stage of <br />reclamation. Undisturbed land is expected to contribute 0.49 tons/acre/year <br />while disturbed lands will yield 3.5 tone/acre/year, The total acreage <br />contributing to these estimates is 1787 acres, of which a maximum of 279 <br />acres will be disturbed at any one time. The estimated yield of 3.5 tons/ <br />acre/year for the disturbed land is much less than the 5.0 tons/acre/year <br />maximum acceptable topsoil loss from agriculturally productive land <br />calculated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation <br />Service (SCSJ. The design Limit was based on continued productivity of <br />topsoils for crop production. <br />TSS will be controlled in runoff from the permit area by detention ponds <br />which have been designed to retain runoff water for a minimum of 24 hours <br />after a storm event. This time period will allow for settling out of <br />TSS and attainment of water quality standards in the Colowyo Coal Company <br />NPDES permit. The detention pond design criteria are discussed in the <br />earlier section, Occurrence of Surface Water. <br />TDS concentrations in receiving streams are expected to remain within the <br />ranges of values known to exist presently. The data presented and <br />discussed earlier show tremendous fluctuations. TDS is inversely related <br />to flow. That is, as the flow decreases, the TDS values increase as a <br />result of a larger proportion of ground water seepage into the drainages <br />as the seasons progress. Runoff-related TDS values are much less due to the <br />dilufion of the minerals influencing this constituent. <br />Specific conductivity is a measure of TDS and also shows the same variability. <br />Parker and Turk (1981) and Bishop and others (1982) have examined and <br />discussed the potential impacts of mining on the hydrology of the Yampa <br />River Basin, and have related TDS and specific conductivity to predictive <br />models of impacts. Both studies show that the Colowyo mine will have no <br />significant impact on the water quality for both the short-term and long- <br />term. Other constituents will not be significantly affected as a result <br />of mining. Iron and manganese mean values did not exceed specific <br />health-related criteria or show signs of acid mine drainage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.