My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL48560
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL48560
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:25:08 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 4:24:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981148
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/24/1978
Doc Name
MEMO-SPECIFIC PROBLEMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The City is also interested in insuring that the grading <br />plan be brought up to date each year, show the previous <br />year's reclamation work and the ensuing year's planned <br />excavation and extraction to assure continuing compliance <br />with City approved plans. §34-32-110(4) of the Act provides <br />that the operator shall annually file a notice of intent to <br />continue and a map or statement indicating the land affected <br />during the preceding year, the land to be affected during <br />the coming year, and the land reclaimed during the preceding <br />year. This statutory provision will provide the City with <br />ample ability .to assure that its concerns are adequately <br />addressed. <br />4. Cor_cern was expressed that a legal description includes <br />some 1200 to 1500 acres versus the area of the mine which is <br />the South Chieftain Mine (less than 10 acres under special <br />permit). <br />Since it is a statutory requirement that a limited <br />impact permit be issued only to those operations covering <br />less than 10 acres, it will be necessary to have Exhibit A <br />corrected to provide for a more precise legal description. <br />Once a legal description is available, it should be carefully <br />analyzed to be sure that less than 10 acres are involved. <br />If it is, ultimately discovered that the operation affects <br />more than 10 acres, Robinson would be required to obtain a <br />standard permit pursuant to the terms of the Act. <br />5. Details must be forthcoming on access (such as limiting <br />to Alameda). How may the City be assured of a hold harmless <br />approach for accidents involving users of the City's parks. <br />A requirement may be made for a certificate of insurance. <br />Since neither the lease nor the Reclamation Act contain <br />provisions pertaining to access, this matter will have to be <br />negotiated. The on-site inspection indicated that the <br />current access being used is acceptable to the City and if <br />Robinson will agree to maintain that as its exclusive means <br />of access this matter can be resolved rather easily. <br />The City can be assured of a hold harmless approach for <br />accidents by virtue of the indemnification clause referred <br />to above. Colorado law does provide that an indemnification <br />agreement can cover the negligence of Robinson as well as <br />the City provided that it specifically so provides and <br />specifically refers to negligence. We can present such a <br />proposal to Robinson and see whether they will agree to it. <br />There is a potential drawback to this approach in that an <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.