Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MfNERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />April 2, 2003 V <br />Terry V. Wetz <br />Director of Project Development <br />International Uranium (USA) Corp. <br />Independence Plaza, Suite 950 <br />1050 Seventeenth Street <br />Denver, CO 80265 <br />RF~~~~~~ <br />APR p 9 <br />Divisional M;nere,a b., <br />-very <br />Re: Carnation Mine, M-1977-416, Revised Map, Site Repor[ and Corrective Actions. <br />Deaz Mr. Wetz, <br />DIVISION O F <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAFETY <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Greg E. Walther <br />Executive Dirxior <br />Ronald W. Cottony <br />Acing Division Director <br />S <br />!,s`~~1-lEf2AL ~d ~ s , <br />Thank you for the thorough packet of updated materials for the site named above, which was received here on <br />March 25, 2003. In this letter, I will try to comment on all of the necessary items from your packet. <br />Boundary Chance <br />The cover letter stated that International Uranium (USA) Corporation ("IUC") proposes a change in the boundary <br />of this 110(2) permit. The map showing the proposed changes includes both original and proposed boundaries. It <br />reveals that most of the present disturbance was inside the original boundaries, and that the boundary changes are <br />minimal. The map shows the removal of undisturbed areas with corresponding additional areas to include the <br />expanded dumps which were outside the original boundaries. The intent to configure the eastern boundary to abut <br />the west edge of the Sunday Mine pernnit boundary is a good idea. <br />The changes will keep the total acreage of the site at 9.76 acres, remaining under the limit for Hazd Rock 110(2) <br />permits. I do not view this as a change constituting a formal release of part of the permitted land, nor a formal <br />addition of new land, for reasons explained in the paragraphs below. <br />There have been several ongoing problems with the permit maps, marking of the boundaries, and defining the <br />extent of permitted activities which are subject [o reclamation liability. Our past discussions regarding the <br />boundary locations, adequacy of maps, and possible disturbances outside of the perceived boundaries have always <br />included the point that these possible offsite excursions were due to the actions of the previous permitted <br />operator(s) of the site and only came to the Division's attention after IUC succeeded as the permittee. In addition, <br />the maps available to IUC at the time of the permit transfer did not contain sufficient topographic or location <br />information to definitively tie down the exact boundary location. <br />In light of these facts, and given IUC's willingness to perform the necessary mapping and inventorying of the site <br />to bring the permit into compliance, I will propose this idea for accomplishing a boundary change to you. <br />Typically, a boundary change involves the formal release of some permitted land, then formally adding other non- <br />permitted land to the permit. Adding land normally requires an amendment to a permit. But my research of the <br />Hard Rock and Metals Rules reveals that amendments to Hard Rock l LO(2) permits such as this one are not <br />authorized. I had also recently mentioned a type of technical revision involving a "land exchange" to reconfigure <br />the boundary. My research of the Hard Rock and Metals policies reveals that no land exchanges are allowed for <br />Hard Rock permits. <br />