My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1995-04-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1977451 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1977451
>
1995-04-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1977451 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2022 10:01:53 AM
Creation date
11/23/2007 4:12:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977451
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/28/1995
Doc Name
CONDITIONAL WITHDRAWAL OF PENDING DESIGNATED MINING OPERATION DETERMINATIN IKE 1 PN M-77-451
From
DMG
To
COTTER CORP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Steven D. Landau -2- April 28, 1995 <br /> C. The existing waste rock dump was topsoiled, well graded, and <br /> sparsely vegetated. <br /> 6. The Division sent the operator a notice of DMO determination in <br /> November, 1994. <br /> 7. The operator responded to the Division's DMO letter in December, 1994 <br /> requesting clarification of the basis for the determination. <br /> 8. The Division responded to the operator in February, 1995. <br /> 9. The operator submitted notice to the Division in March, 1995 disputing <br /> the Division's determination pursuant to Rule 7.2.4. <br /> 10. The package submitted to the Division by the operator claimed that the <br /> Ike No. 1 does not meet the criteria for DMO classification. The <br /> operator presented its argument for an exemption. Mr. Harry Posey, <br /> with the Division, reviewed the submittal and concluded that additional <br /> testing of the waste rock material is needed since the operator's test <br /> data does not appear to represent the natural conditions at the site. <br /> 11. Pursuant to Rule 7.2.4(1)(a) the Division met with the operator on <br /> April 18, 1995. <br /> During the meeting the operator and the Division agreed that this permit, <br /> based on current site conditions, did not warrant DMO status at the <br /> present time. DMO status may be warranted in the future if the operator <br /> cannot present documentation, or demonstrate, to the Division that the <br /> operation will not expose or disturb toxic-forming materials in quantities <br /> sufficient to adversely affect human health, property, or the environment. <br /> Currently, the operator does not anticipate creating any new waste <br /> dumps in the permit area for another couple of years. So, as a <br /> condition of this withdrawal, the operator will be required to complete the <br /> following tasks: <br /> a. Notify the Division within 30 days after waste rock material <br /> is being deposited at the surface. <br /> b. Collect and analyze the waste rock material as it is being <br /> deposited at the surface when mining activities begin. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.