Laserfiche WebLink
an increase in runoff amounts. The rate ofrunoff will increase over natural conditions <br />because of the increased efficiency of conveyance channels. However, these effects <br />are moderated by the detention of runoff in the pond and subsequent evaporation of <br />pond water. In general, only slight changes in the hydrologic balance of surface water <br />aze expected due to the underground mining operations proposed at the King Coal <br />Mine. <br />Changes in water quality can be expected to occur as a result of mining. Increase in <br />erosion rates aze expected from the disturbance of soils and vegetation, however, these <br />aze compensated by deposition of sediment in the sediment pond. An increase in total <br />dissolved solids (TDS) may occur from well water pumped and used for dust <br />suppression and other operational use. Evaporation ofwater standing in the pond may <br />also cause an increase in TDS, although the increase above background concentrations <br />(1500-2000 mg/1) is not expected to be lazge. <br />The Division has determined that probable hydrologic effects on surface water <br />identified above will not preclude use of the water below the point of dischazge from <br />the mine. This conclusion is based on the small and infrequent flows relative to the <br />lazge amount of dilution available in receiving waters. The quality of surface water is <br />limited on site and the treatment systems should act to mitigate any adverse effects on <br />surface water. <br />Ground Water Effects <br />There are two potentially impacted ground water systems within and adjacent to the <br />King Coal operation: the Menefee Formation and the Hay Gulch alluvial system. <br />The probable hydrologic consequences of mining to the Menefee Formation aze <br />negligible. The Menefee is essentially dry at the King Coal Mine. This has been <br />historically documented during past operations. Additionally, a drilling program <br />initiated in 1980 for the proposed Shalako Mine (about 1 mile northeast of the King <br />Coal Mine in Hay Gulch) confirmed that the coal and overburden aze essentially free of <br />water. Perched aquifers, which may be located above the mined seam, will be <br />dewatered during the course of mining operations . The perched aquifers above the <br />mine are probably limited both in number and in azeal extent. There is no documented <br />use of any of these aquifers, nor is there any evidence to suggest that these aquifers <br />supply base flow to any local steams or springs. Therefore, impacts to perched <br />aquifers, and the Menefee Forration as a whole, will be minimal. <br />The second ground water system identified neaz the permit area is the Hay Gulch <br />alluvial aquifer. This aquifer system may be potentially affected by surface runoff <br />from the mine bench or dischazges from the sediment pond potentially infiltrating into <br />the alluvial body. This infiltration could cause localized increases in total dissolved <br />solids within the alluvium. The probability ofthis occurring is minimal. The sediment <br />control system at the King Coal Mine has been designed to minimize impacts to the <br />prevailing hydrologic balance at and neaz the permit azea. All surface runoff from the <br />16 <br />