Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-3b- <br />CUMULATIVE HYDROLOGIC IMPACTS OF MINING <br />Because of their proximity to each other, the Allen and the Maxweii mines•are <br />expected to have cumulative hydrologic impacts on surface and ground water <br />systems. Possible combined impacts include dewatering of the coal seam and <br />overburden aquifers, depressions of the piezometric surfaces in these <br />aquifers, deterioration of the quality of ground water flowing through <br />abandoned coal workings into coal aquifers, depletion of flow in the <br />stream/alluvial aquifer system, and a deterioration of water quality in the <br />stream/alluvial aquifer system. Water quality impacts to the Purgatoire River <br />would be greatest during operations when mine water is discharged from the two <br />mines. <br />The Allen and Maxwell coal seams lie close to one another in the stratigraphic <br />column, separated by approximately 20 feet of interburden material. <br />Disturbance of roof, floor, and interburden material during mining, and <br />subsidence after mining, will result in the breakdown of the interburden <br />strata. As a result, hydrologic communication is expected to occur between <br />the two coal seams, and ground water impacts are expected to be cumulative. <br />The following assessment considers the two coal seams as one aquifer. <br />During operations, dewatering would occur in the coal aquifer and the drawdown <br />of the piezometric surface could extend outward to approximately 3 miles from <br />each mine. Since the mines are adjacent to each other, a portion of these <br />affected areas would overlap. Within that zone, drawdown effects would be <br />additive. <br />After the cessation of operations, mine water would no longer be discharged <br />and the abandoned workings would fill with water. The ground water level and <br />piezometric surface would partially recover. A permanent depression in the <br />piezometric surface of the coal aquifer would exist in the vicinity of the <br />flooded workings of the mines. The depression would not be large, but it may <br />extend 3 miles from each mine. Approximately twice as much ground water would <br />flow through the flooded mine workings than flowed through the undisturbed <br />coal prior to mining. This mine water flow would, however, be restricted by <br />the low permeability of the undisturbed coal surrounding the mine workings. <br />Ground water would stagnate in the mine workings and react with fragmented <br />roof, floor, coal, rock dust, and other materials in the mine cavity. This <br />ground water would have a poorer quality than water currently pumped from <br />underground workings, which is similar to ground water observed in the Allen <br />refuse pile. The total dissolved solids levels are expected to equal or <br />exceed 2600 mg/1 (Exhibit 6, Table 13 of the permit application). This ground <br />water would spread as a plume down dip. The effect of having two mining <br />operations affecting strata in hydrologic conmunication with one another would <br />be to decrease dilution within the aquifers and increase the distance a <br />detectable mine water plume would spread. The degradation of water quality in <br />the coal aquifers will not impact ground water use in the general area, since <br />the poor quality and depth limited use originally. <br />