Laserfiche WebLink
No proposed or listed threatened or endangered plant species of federal or <br />state concern were identified during the Mariah or the WRDC investigations. <br />Therefore, pursuant to Rule 2,07, 6(1)(n), the Division finds that the mining <br />activities will not affect the existence of or result in the destruction or <br />adverse modification of endangered or threatened species or their critical <br />habitats, respectively, <br />As addressed in Section II - Land Use, Peabody will be reclaiming the affected <br />areas to either dryland pasture or rangeland. Both of these areas will be <br />reclaimed with the same seed mixture (Seed Mix No. 1 -Volume 10, Tab 13, p, <br />13-8). In the more me sic areas of the mine drainage channel, riparian <br />vegetation will be established using a different seed mixture (Seed Mix No. 2 <br />- Volume 10, Tab 13, p, 13-10). Shrubs and trees will be planted in selected <br />areas in the rangeland and riparian reclamation areas where the potential for <br />success is higher, <br />During the Mariah inventory, two reference areas were established: grassland <br />and upland sagebrush. Since that time, the usage of these reference areas has <br />been in question due to the proposed post-mining land use. As part of the <br />Permit Revision No, 1 application, Peabody has proposed new methods for <br />determining re vegetation success by totally dropping the grassland reference <br />area and only using the upland sagebrush reference area for selected <br />parameters (Volume 10, Tab 13, p, 13-17 to 13-23), The grassland reference <br />area is dominated by weedy and annual plant species rendering this area <br />undesirable, The upland sagebrush reference area is dominated by woody plant <br />species whereas the proposed post-mining land use requires dominance by <br />herbaceous plant species (ie.: dryland pasture and rangeland). <br />After meeting with Peabody, reviewing the submitted information and in <br />consultation with the Office of Surface Mining (OSM), the Division has agreed <br />to the requested modifications to determining reclamation success, Summarized <br />below by parameter are the re vegetation success standards for the Nuc1a Mine. <br />The discussion by parameters below is broken into two areas since Peabody is <br />proposing to mine areas previously mined and reclaimed prior to the enactment <br />of the Colorado Permanent Regulatory Program. In these areas, the <br />requirements of Rule 4,15.10 are applicable; whereas, in all other portions of <br />the Nucla Mine, the requirements of Rule 4,15.8 are applicable. (Reference <br />Exhibit 13-1 a, Tab 13, Volume 10 for the location of these various areas.) <br />1. Cover - For those areas meeting the requirements of Rule 4.15,8, cover <br />wi be measured by comparing the total vegetative cover of the upland <br />sagebrush reference area to the total vegetative cover of the reclaimed <br />areas. Vegetative cover of the re vegetated areas will be considered <br />acceptable if it is at least 90% of the total vegetative cover of the <br />reference area with 90% statistical confidence for at least the last two <br />consecutive years of the ten year liability period. <br />For those areas satisfying the requirements of Rule 4,15.10, minimum <br />round cover of living plants shall not be less than can be supported by <br />~he best available topsoil or other suitable material in the re affected <br />areas, shall not be less than the ground cover existing before <br />redisturbance, and shall be adequate to control erosion, Peabody will be <br />-23- <br />