My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL47652
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL47652
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:22:54 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 3:41:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/18/2000
Doc Name
CLARIFICATION ON RECOMMERDATIONS FOR GROUND WATER MONITORING IN THE SAN LUIS AREA
From
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
To
WQCD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~. <br />rd <br />contaminants that might be of greatest threat to a drinking water supply; locals can use this <br />information to adopt protective measures for their source waters and contingency plans in the <br />event of a mishap. The approach used in my work was an ultraconservative groundwater <br />velocity calculation which is technically consistent with and applied based on the recommended <br />methods for WPHA/SWAA delineation within the State's programs. The resulting value of time <br />of travel was presented for comparison versus the existing State policy of 5 yeazs to show <br />whether or not the facility in question would be located within the WHPA/SWAA that would be <br />delineated based on ground-water flow time of travel determinations. <br />The calculation of time of travel from the southwestem mine permit boundary to the <br />town's nearest drinking water-supply well was performed using values for aquifer parameters of <br />the Alamosa Formation within which the town's drinking water-supply wells are co;npleted. <br />This hydrogeological assessment was made even though it is not the Alamosa Formation but the <br />Santa Fe Formation, a low permeability unit, that underlies the southwest permit boundary area <br />and extends out into the basin. It is between the area occupied by the Santa Fe Formation and the <br />town that the Alamosa Formation actually becomes a part of the ground-water pathway of <br />concern. Nevertheless, by using the Alamosa Formation in the analysis, the approach becomes <br />ultraconservative and consistent with the State's drinking water protection programs for <br />development of the WHPA/S WAA for the town's wells. Based on this approach, the estimated <br />time of travel of ] 5 yeazs from the southwestem extreme of the mine permit boundary to the <br />nearest we]] exceeds the State policy value for drinking water protection by a factor ~f 2. <br />Therefore, this facility would not fall within the WHPA/SWAA based on the ground-water flow <br />pathway alone under the State's policy and ultraconservative approaches to delineation. <br />If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 303-312-6595. <br />Sincerely, <br />2N.'4 M ,.~~ <br />Rich Muza, Hydrologist <br />Ecosystems Protection Program <br />Office of Ecosystems Protection and Re~mediation <br />cc. Juanita Bernal, SLWSD <br />Mike McGowan, CCCD <br />Jim Dillie, CDNR-DMG <br />Cazol Russell, 8EPR-EP <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.