My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL47526
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL47526
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:22:40 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 3:35:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/30/1994
Doc Name
MEMO GEC EAST PIT CLAIM C-81-037 RN-MINES-EWW
From
DMG
To
SANDRA BROWN
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Item # 14 Amount -,8150.00 <br />LkI~ ~~ ~,~~5 <br />For 2 hrs with the D7 Cat at $75.00 per how. No. 8 on the Final Inspection and Cemficate <br />of Completion requested that the road into the West Pit area be sloped 2% into the hill <br />Originally, this road was built using equipment nrttal time AU lurk to be done on this road <br />is additional work (Field Directive #4 Item Na 2 requests CWL to do his work using <br />equipment rental time). This work was performed Then a rainstorm silted in the slope, CWL <br />was requested to redo the sbpe on the Final Inspection, and performed this work CWL is <br />entitled to compensation for such additional rental time <br />Response: Field directive number 4 dated June 7, 1994 and signed by the CONTRACTOR <br />on June 14, 1994 states that "Utilizing machine time, construct a combination ditch-access <br />road from the fuel loadout, following the flags to intersect the old road, road to be 10' wide, <br />and with a 2% dip toward the hi1L The overall grade flowing north to Magpie Creek shall <br />not exceed S%." The lower portion of the road into the west pit was not sloped at 2% into <br />the hill as requested by the Project Manager. Precipitation only sewed to illustrate this fact <br />by overflowing the road in several places. This is illustrated in the attached slide. The <br />OWNER will not pay twice for work because the CONTRACTOR did not do it correctly <br />the fast time. The CONTRACTOR is not due additional money to complete the work in <br />accordance with Field Directive #4. <br />~/~~~P <br />AuR~M 6 <br />f1~~T <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.