My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL47522
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL47522
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:22:40 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 3:35:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/16/2006
Doc Name
Final EIS & Record of Decision for the Dry Fork Lease
From
US Forest Service
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Chapter 3 <br />observed to be generally successful between two <br />and five years after reclamation work is completed. <br />Activities resulting in disturbance on steep or <br />unstable slopes of soil types with high erosion or <br />mass movement hazard may result in increased <br />erosion or trigger land slides. These hazards and <br />related effects of disturbance are more likely to be <br />present where existing geologic hazards and steep <br />slopes are identified in Figure 3-2. Disturbances on <br />these slopes may also prove more difficult to <br />revegetate and stabilize during reclamation. The <br />GMUG Forest Plan calls for limiting ground- <br />disturbing activities on unstable slopes and highly <br />erosive areas. Further, the Forest Plan recognizes <br />special leasing stipulations may be required to <br />prohibit occupancy on steep or highly erosive <br />slopes. <br />Appendix C identifies potential lease stipulations <br />for protecting or mitigating effects to soils, geologic <br />hazards, and slopes. <br />Alternative C <br />Impacts to surface features resulting from <br />topographic and geologic changes imposed by <br />longwall mining subsidence from this altemative <br />would be to a lesser degree than Alternative B due <br />to a decrease in the area of mining and avoidance of <br />the Deep Creek channel. The reduced area of <br />mining area would have fewer disturbances from <br />both surface use (43 acres) and subsidence. <br />Seven feet of subsidence is likely in most areas. Up <br />to 14 feet of subsidence could occur in some areas <br />if multiple-seam mining occurs. Subsidence would <br />not occur to the degree as Altemative B in areas <br />east of Deep Creek. <br />Soils <br />Impacts to soils resulting from this alternative will <br />be less than Altemative B due to a decrease in the <br />area of mining and avoidance of the Deep Creek <br />channel. The reduced mining area would also have <br />fewer disturbances from both surface use and <br />subsidence. Impacts to the Deep Creek channel and <br />significant portions of the basin would be avoided, <br />thereby reducing the potential for channel <br />adjustments and sediment loading. Other impacts to <br />the soil resource are expected to be comparable to <br />Dry Fork Lease-By-Application FEIS <br />Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences <br />those resulting from the Proposed Action with only <br />the area of impacts reduced. <br />3.2.4.1 Cumulative Effects <br />Alternative A <br />Topography and Geology <br />The area would not be leased and no mining would <br />occur; therefore, all topographic and geologic <br />conditions within the Dry Fork LBA tract would <br />remain in their current state. <br />The North Fork Valley has numerous existing <br />natural landslides and other unstable features that <br />contribute to topographic changes in the area, These <br />processes will continue to occur. In addition, the <br />areas north and northwest of the Dry Fork LBA <br />tract have been subsided by mining of one or more <br />coal seams. The area immediately west of the Dry <br />Fork LBA tract is leased, and the permitting process <br />for actual mining is currently underway. This <br />mining-induced subsidence has and will continue to <br />contribute changes to the general topography in this <br />area. Sinec 1981, lowering of the land surface by an <br />estimated 2 to 10 feet within the angle of draw has <br />occurred. These changes in elevation are not <br />noticeable to the causal observer (USDA Forest <br />Service 2003a). <br />Mining in approved and permitted areas to the north <br />and south of the tract would occur over the next 10 <br />to 15 years and would impart similar impacts on the <br />land surface as described in this section. Subsidence <br />in these adjacent areas will occur, lowering the land <br />surface. Surface-tension cracks may form in <br />isolated areas. Existing surface-tension cracks on <br />sandstone outcrops have been noted in the western <br />portion of Section 28, T13S, R90W (a place known <br />as Apache Rocks) and in the northern portion of <br />section 27, T13S, R90W. These surface-tension <br />cracks range from 1 to 3 inches wide, extend up to <br />50 feet laterally on the surface, and are believed to <br />range from 20 to 50 feet in depth. These cracks <br />formed on ridge tops in rigid sandstone layers are <br />not expected to close completely, but will be locally <br />visible for years to come. <br />3-13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.