Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 2 <br />Alternatives <br />Protect the Sunset Trail area, specifically <br />wildlife habitat values, roadless character, and <br />recreation opportunities. <br />The Proposed Action does not include any activities <br />in the Sunset Trail area. Reasonably foreseeable <br />future actions considered in the cumulative effects <br />analysis include potential future activity in the <br />Sunset Trail area. MCC has an agreement with the <br />Wilderness Society, Colorado Wild, Center for <br />Native Ecosystems, American Lands Alliance, and <br />the Wildland Center for Preventing Roads to not <br />propose any activities in the Sunset Trail area for 5 <br />years commencing in July 2002 or until the GMUG <br />Forest Plan is revised, whichever comes first. <br />During EIS preparation, fallow only the <br />guidelines for construction in "roadless <br />areas" that were in effect during the time of <br />submittal <br />The Forest Service is currently managing road <br />construction activities in IRAs according to an <br />agency Interim Directive (1920-2004-1) issued in <br />July 2004. This directive must be applied to all <br />activities in IRAs for which NEPA decisions are <br />made after the effective date of the directive. <br />Analyze impacts to agriculture, specifically <br />along the Minnesota Creek corridor. <br />The Minnesota Creek corridor is outside the <br />cumulative impact area for this coal leasing <br />analysis. <br />Discuss current and projected road <br />management and closures. <br />This issue is outside the scope of the leasing <br />analysis. Where road management may have <br />cumulative effects, an analysis occurs in the <br />cumulative effects sections. <br />Complete the NEPA process in an efficient <br />and timely manner. <br />The EIS is prepared according to all applicable <br />laws, NEPA guidelines, and agency direction. <br />Address impacts (from methane venting to air <br />quality, global climate change, West Elk <br />Wilderness Area, and national resources. <br />Methane venting is not part of the Proposed Action. <br />Impacts related to reasonably foreseeable future <br />actions that may involve methane venting are <br />discussed in the cumulative effects sections. <br />Discuss reclamation (bonding, native species). <br />The CDMG oversees coal mining activity in <br />Colorado. The mines are required to have State- <br />approved mine permits. The State levies and <br />administers all the reclamation bonds. The bonding <br />level is determined at the time a mine permit is <br />issued or revised, and is not part of the leasing <br />analysis (see Section 1.3). <br />Provide information on stage 5 old growth. <br />To the Forest Service's knowledge, no old growth <br />that would be classified as stage 5 is present in [he <br />Dry Fork LBA area. <br />2.4 ALTERNATIVE A: <br />NO ACTION <br />Under the No Action alternative, the Dry Fork LBA <br />tract would not be offered for competitive sale and <br />no mining would occur in these specific areas. It is <br />assumed that MCC would continue its present coal <br />mining activities at the West Elk Mine. <br />Impacts from mining would not occur on this tract, <br />and the effects from ongoing land uses would <br />continue. The land would continue to be managed <br />according to Forest Plan standards, goals, and <br />guidelines. <br />2.5 ALTERNATIVE B: <br />PROPOSED ACTION <br />The Proposed Action is consent to lease NFS lands <br />in the Dry Fork LBA tract for underground <br />development and production of Federal coal <br />reserves, consistent with applicable laws and <br />regulations, including terms and conditions for <br />protecting non-coal resources. <br />Dry Fork Lease-By-Application FEIS 2-5 <br />