Laserfiche WebLink
practical means to avoid or nilnimize environmental harm resulting from my decision have been <br />adopted. <br />Applicable Laws, Regulations, and Policy <br />The selected altemative meets requirements under the Mineral Leasing Act, as amended, the <br />National Environmental Policy Act, National Forest Management Act, and other applicable laws <br />and regulations (refer to Section D of this document and EIS, Section 1.3). <br />How Issues Were Considered <br />The general issue of concern is the potential for underground mine subsidence to affect surface <br />resources. This overarching concern was described in the Issues (EIS, Section 2.3) that were <br />analyzed in the EIS. Potential impacts will be mitigated by the application of the Coal Lease <br />Stipulations, displayed in Appendix A of this document. <br />Other concerns focused on the potential effects that post-lease surface use would impart to water <br />resources, wildlife, vegetation, roadless character and other land uses of the area. Suggestions <br />were made to include a no surface occupancy stipulation on the lease to preserve roadless <br />chazacter, or to select an alternative to stop mining at the inventoried roadless area boundary <br />(EIS, Sections 2.3 and 2.7). The effects of post-lease surface use to the extent i[ is reasonably <br />foreseeable (EIS, Section 1.8) were analyzed in the EIS (Chapter 3). <br />Portions of the Dry Fork LBA tract lie within the West Elk Inventoried Roadless Area (IItA). <br />The EIS analyzed this potential for coal leasing to alter the roadless character of the IRA (EIS <br />Section 3.7). The roadless chazacter of the West Elk IRA was evaluated during the Roadless <br />Area Review and Evaluation (RARE) I and II in the 1970s. The portion of the IItA in which the <br />Dry Fork LBA tract is located was not recommended for wilderness designation, or identified as <br />a "further planning area". The Colorado Wildemess Act of 1980 released the portions of the <br />West Elk II2A not having been added to the West Elk Wildemess and all other GMUG NFS <br />lands for non-wldemess management. The area in which the Dry Fork LBA tract lies is <br />designated in the Forest Plan for primary management focus on wildlife habitat management, <br />livestock grazing and riparian azea management (EIS, Section 1.4). The West Elk IRA was also <br />evaluated for roadless character in the GMUG Oil and Gas Leasing Environmental Impact <br />Statement (1993). The associated Record of Decision states that the portion of the West Elk IRA <br />west of Coal Creek (Coal Creek lies about 3 miles east of the Dry Fork federal coal lease tract) <br />has existing coal leases, and that exploration activities and existing roads have compromised <br />roadless character values. <br />Additional roadless character analysis was preformed on the portion of the IRA in which the Dry <br />Fork LBA tract is located for the Coal Methane Drainage Project, Panels 16 to 24 (USDA-FS, <br />2002). This analysis found that that the area retained little roadless character, and would be <br />difficult to manage as wilderness with the existing coal lease obligations. <br />Approval of this federal coal lease application, based on the effects of the Reasonably <br />Foreseeable Mine Plan and Foreseeable Surface Use (EIS, Section 1.8), with implementation of <br />special Coal Lease Stipulations (Appendix A of this document), will not alter the roadless <br />character of the IRA. This Decision is made understanding the current circumstances pertaining <br />to II2A management, and is consistent with the GMUG Forest Plan in this regard. Consent to <br />leasing these lands for underground coal mining will not alter the existing roadless character. <br />3 <br />