My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL47342
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL47342
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:22:21 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 3:22:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/12/1994
Doc Name
RESPONSES TO LETTERS OF 2-22-94 AND 2-24-94 BASIN RESOURCES INC THE GOLDEN EAGLE MINE PN C-81-013
From
DMG
To
ROBERT F T KRASSA
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Robert F. T. ICrassa -2- April 12, 1994 <br />surface tract is limited to extraction of the mineral under that particular property only. <br />Findings documents developed by our Division are prepared for the basis of <br />documenting that applications for permits and revisions are in compliance with the <br />regulations and thus approvable, and not for the purposes of making generalized legal <br />statements. <br />Rule 2.03.6(1) requires applications to contain only a description of the documents <br />upon which the applicant bases its legal right to enter and begin surface coal mining <br />operations in the permit area, and whether that right is the subject pending litigation. <br />This rule further requires the description to identify those documents by type and date <br />of execution, identify We specific lands to which the document pertains, and explain <br />the legal rights claimed by We applicant. The Golden Eagle Mine permit application <br />provides this, and our Findings Document affums the operator's compliance. <br />3. Thank you for your comments regarding Stipulations 66 through 70. We have <br />appreciated the cooperation of all those involved in these proceedings. <br />4. The application materials required pursuant to Rule 2.05.3(2)(b) have been submitted. <br />We have asked Basin Resources to provide some revised exhibits that provide this <br />information in a more concise manner. When this revised information is submitted, <br />we will notify you. <br />5. Two issues appear to be discussed in this paragraph. The first is whether one of the <br />existing ."test" holes on the north side of the Purgatoire River should be used as a <br />groundwater monitoring well. - - <br />Basin Resources is developing a plan for monitoring the regional groundwater, which <br />will be submitted soon. We will review their plans as soon as they are submitted, <br />and determine whether any additional monitoring wells are needed. We will advise <br />you of the submittal of this information as soon as it arrives. <br />The second issue is whether any of the wells in the area of Rancho Escondido should <br />monitor the hydrologic characteristics of the Trinidad Sandstone specifically. <br />It was our understanding from the meeting held with Basin and Raton West on <br />Febnrary 23, 1994 that Raton West's concerns with impacts to the Trinidad Sandstone <br />were raised after reviewing Part 3 of Stipulation 67 in the Golden Eagle Findings <br />Document. The Division's request for a plan to monitor the inflow into the <br />Golden Eagle Mine was based upon statements made in the Division's Findings <br />Document pursuant to We approval of the 1989 Permit Revision. In that document, it <br />was stated that water was flowing into the mine workings situated south of the <br />Purgatoire River. Water was apparently being transmitted to the workings from <br />below via a geologic fault. The Division concluded in the 1989 Findings Document <br />that the source of this water was the Trinidad Sandstone, as no other <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.