Laserfiche WebLink
,~ <br />Plaintiffs James and Ann Tatum, hereinafter "TATLTM" initiated this litigation by filing <br />their complaint against the Defendant Basin Resources, Inc., hereinafter ",BRI". Talton asserts, <br />the following claims: <br />First, that BRI breached a certain contract dated June 1,1988 (Plaintiffs Exhibit I{IC, <br />attached) wherein it (BRI) agreed to trade certain water rights. (Maxwell Ditch trade). <br />Second, that $RI breached a certain oral agreement entered into between the parties at <br />around the same time, to trade a second water right. (Consolidated Ditch trade). <br />Third, Tatum claims that underground mining operations conducted by the defendants <br />have damaged their property, including the residence alternatively referred to during the teal <br />as the "Erickson House", the "Tatum Residence", and "Solitario". Tatum claims that mining <br />operations near or under their property caused substantial structural damage to the residence <br />and that the cause was subsidence resulting from mining operations. <br />Finally, Tatum asserts that BRI further damaged their property by installing a ventilation <br />shaft and fan on their property which had the effect of causing a well on that portion of the <br />property to dry up, and also rendering a portion of his land unusable. Tatum also asserts claims <br />for punitive damages, which the Court dismissed ai the end of Plaintiffs' case, and for attorney <br />fees. <br />Defendant, while acknowledging the enforceability of the June 1, 1988 Agreement, <br />interprets the contract in a manner different than Tatum; their interpretation preventing the <br />implementation of any agreement to exchange the use of water rights. Defendant also denies <br />the existence of any agreement to convey water rights on the Consolidated Ditch, denies <br />causing any subsidence damage to plaintiffs property, and disagrees with Tatum as to the <br />damages caused by use of their property for construction of a certain ventilation shaft <br />A¢reement To Exchanee Water Ri¢hts-Maxwell Ditch: In early 1988, Wyoming Fuel <br />Company experienced underground production problems in their mining operations involving <br />excess gas, excess water, and soft IIoors that severely threatened their ability to meet prod- <br />uction and mine safety requirements. Tn order to commence addressing those problems and <br />in order to avoid a lengthy delay to obtain a permit, Wyoming Fuel Company negotiated <br />with Tatum for waiver of a certain waiting period required by Colorado Revised Statutes <br />34-33-101 et.seq. Wyoming Fuel Company entered into an Agreement with Tatum to exchange <br />