My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL47148
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL47148
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:21:57 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 3:11:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/6/1995
Doc Name
Further Review of Impacts from well (Goes w/Compliant Ltr 1/12/04)
From
DMG
To
Ms Ann Tatum
Permit Index Doc Type
Citizen Complaints
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
minute. Inflows have decreased considerably since this time to 0.2 gallons per minute, <br />measured directly below the shaft, as reported in the 1994 annual hydrologic monitoring <br />report. Earlier measurements of inflow included inflow from mine workings adjacent to <br />the shaft as well as inflow from the shaft. Tate operator now measures inflows directly <br />beneath the shaft using a calibrated flume. <br />Year Intlow <br />1991 20 gpm <br />1992 15 gpm <br />1993 10 gpm <br />1994 0.2 gpm <br />Pumping of the Tatum Well <br />The Tatum well was pumped to get a rough estimate of its ma~amum capacity of the well <br />in its present poor condition A depth probe was placed at the bottom of the hole prior <br />to placing the pump in the well in order to avoid hanging up the probe on Ute pump <br />hose, wire and rope. <br />Aa electric pump owned by Ivlr. Tatum was lowered down into the well. This pump was <br />powered by a generator switched to 220 volts. Mr. Tatum stated that the pump would <br />produce up to 30 gallons per minute, The pump inlet was placed at about 10 feet from <br />the bottom of the welt, which corresponded to 10 feet above the previous intake of the <br />windmill pump. This level was chosen to avoid sucking in mud and debris and possibly <br />damaging the electric pump. At the time of the test, the water in the well was estimated <br />to be 1125 feet below the top of the casing or a little higher. The pump appazatus may <br />have displaced some of the water, thereby lowering the appazent water table in the well <br />when the pump string was pulled. <br />The pump was ntn until the well was dry. The pump was equipped with a checkvah+e <br />that would not allow water to flow back down the well. Water level recovery was <br />measured in 1(10 foot increments as follows: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.