Laserfiche WebLink
<br />INORGANIC DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW <br />80LDIN6 TINES <br />All CLP-SOW holding times were met. <br />Yee X NO <br />All technical holding times were met. <br />Yea X No <br />Comments: Nana <br />INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION: STANDARDS AND RT.11r«` <br />Initial instrument calibrations were performed according to contract <br />requirements. <br />Yee X No <br />Comments: None <br />The instruments were calibrated daily and each time an analysis run was <br />performed. <br />Yee 7C NO <br />Comments: None <br />The instruments were calibrated using one blank and the appropriate <br />number of standards. <br />Yee X No <br />Comments: None <br />FORK 1 - SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS <br />Sample analyses were entered correctly on the Form I's. <br />Y2B NO % <br />Comments: According to the raw data, two different ICPe were used for <br />sample analyaee. The soil samples were analyzed on instrument TJA #1 <br />and the water samples were analyzed on instrument TJA #2. According to <br />FORK 14, the Analytical Run Logs, only instrument TJA #1 was used for <br />the analysis of both soils and waters. IDLe, IECe and Linear Ranges <br />ware only provided for instrument TJA #l. The results for the water <br />eemplee ware reported correctly on the FORM le from TJA #2, however the <br />IDLe used to report the water samples could not be verified. <br />4 <br />a <br />