My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL46965
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL46965
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:21:32 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 3:01:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981023
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/30/1990
Doc Name
APPENDIX IV PERMIT INFO FOR IRREGATED PASTURE
Permit Index Doc Type
VEGETATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
overstory of Ponderosa pine and juniper. The concentration of shrub <br />and tree species on lower slopes is an indication that soils are deeper <br />here and moisture is more prevalent. There is essentially no <br />vegetative cover on the ridge tops. The absence of vegetation is <br />indicative of the shallow soils in this zone. Sandstone and shale <br />outcrops are common along the ridge tops, especially on the large <br />t barren ridge in the eastern portion of the permit area. <br />The major limiting factor for vegetative production on this site is low <br />available moisture. Annual precipitation rates are typically low and <br />' most precipitation occurs during the winter. Due to the shallow nature <br />of the soil, the quantity of moisture held in recharge is low. <br />Further, moisture is lost rapidly through evapo-transportation which is <br />accelerated by the south and west orientation of slopes within the <br />area. <br />Trrieated Pasture <br />A vegetation survey was performed in May, 1982 on the irrigated pasture <br />' between [he present mine area and the revision area to determine <br />present productivity and cover. A total of 6 transects 150 feet long <br />were samples as shown in Figure 2, Pasture Vegetation Survey. Five <br />plots were taken along each transect at 30-foot intervals. Cover and <br />' productivity were examined at each plot. Cover was sampled using a <br />10-point frame one meter in length. Productivity was sampled by <br />clipping vegetation within a 4 ft.z circular plot and segregating plant <br />' material into high and low palatability classes. This material was <br />Cher, oven-dried and weighed. The plant species encountered during the <br />survey are described in Table 11, Pasture Species List. <br />' The results of this survey are presented in Table 12, Pasture <br />Vegetation Survey. The character of the vegetation changes <br />significantly in different locations within the pasture. The major <br />' difference is apparently due to subtle changes in elevation that create <br />wet and dry areas. Zone A in the northern portion of the pasture was <br />significantly drier than other portions of the pasture. This resulted <br />' in a much lower cover and production than the other areas. Zone B <br />generally was intermediate between t}~e wetter and drier zones. This <br />area had much higher cover and production in the high palatability <br />' species than A and C. Zone C was a depression area that was obviously <br />much wetter than the rest of the pasture. Juncus balticas (baltic <br />rush) was the dominant vegetative cover here which is indicative of <br />poor drainage. <br />The high percentages of low palatability species such as Taraxacum <br />officinales (dandelion), Cichorium spp. (chicory), and Convolvulis <br />' spp. (bindweed) is an indication of the poor management practices <br />utilized on this pasture. SCS personnel reported that the owner has <br />over-grazed this pasture in the past and continues to do so. <br />1 <br />' 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.