My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL46903
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL46903
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:21:21 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 2:59:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977210
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/23/2000
Doc Name
SNYDER QUARRY PN M-77-210 LETTER FROM FRED G LUISZER PHD CITING POSSIBLE ASSOCIATED GROUNDWATER
From
DMG
To
CASTLE CONCRETE CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />• • iii iiiiiiiiiiiii iii <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />D~tpartmenr of Nani rat Reoources <br />I} 1 3 Sherman 51., Room : I S <br />Denver, Colurodo 80203 <br />Phone: 1303) 8563557 <br />FAx. 17031 872-8106 <br />May 23.2000 <br />Mr. Rick Paraday <br />Castle Concrete Co. <br />P.O. Boz 2379 <br />Colorado Springs, CO 80901-000 / <br />RE: Snyder Quarty (Permit M-77-210) Letter from Fred G. Luiszer, Ph.D. citing possible associated groundwater <br />problem <br />Dear Mr. Paraday: <br />Enclosed is a letter recently received by the Division in regard to a possible groundwater problem associated with <br />the re-opening of the Snyder Quarry. The letter does not necessarily constitute a complaint about the operation in <br />its present, essentially inactive state, and Dr. Luiszer does not represent himself as a potentially injured party. It is, <br />however, very possible that this letter and/or the thesis findings referred to by Dr. Luiszer, may be used by some <br />one closer to the site, e.g. in Manitou Springs, as the basis of a complaint. Should such a complaint be received in <br />regard to or following the resumption of active operations a[ the Quarty, the Division would be required to look <br />into the matter and the possibility of groundwater pollution by the operation as well as offsite damage. <br />~~ <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAFETY <br />Bill D.+ens <br />Guvernrn <br />Gmg E. watcher <br />E.CCwi,p Dircclo, <br />hLChael B. Long <br />Division Direaar <br />The Division cannot forecast the future and such a complaint may never be made. Nevertheless, it would appear in <br />the best interests of Castle Concrete Co., as operator of the quarry, to re-examine its operational plan for the site. <br />That re-examination should include an evaluation of the effectiveness of those measures already in place as well as <br />those which might be taken to ensure compliance with C.R.S. 34-32.5-116 (4) (d) and (h). These sections of the Act <br />require no unauthorized release of pollutants to ground water and the minimization of any disturbances to the <br />prevailing hydrologic balance of the affected land and surrounding area. <br />IF you have any questions on the above, please contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />~~ G~~ec~u.a <br />James C. Stevens <br />Sr. Specialist <br />Enclosure <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.