My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL46850
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL46850
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:21:18 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 2:57:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/12/1998
Doc Name
COMMENTS ON DRAFT INDIVIDUAL INDUSTRIAL PN CO-0045161 COLOWYO COAL CO LP DMG PN C-81-019
From
DMG
To
CDOH
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10-year, 24-hour event. Now assume the pond self-discharges (rather than is dewatered <br />manually). It is our understanding that the alternative limitations described on page 3 <br />of the Permit (Part I.A.I.a.) could apply. <br />Now assume a scenario where the same type and volume of water enters a pond, but the <br />precipitation event that created the runoff occurred over a 36-hour period, rather than <br />a 24-hour period as described above. [t is our understanding that when the pond self <br />discharges under this second scenario, alternate effluent limitations, rather than primary <br />limitations, would apply. Is this correct'? <br />13. Assume a new scenario in which five consecutive non-overlapping 24-hour periods <br />elapse. Assume during each of these 24-hour periods, a 6-year, 24-hour event occurs, <br />Assume now that Colowyo elects to manually open a pond's dewatering valve during <br />the fourth non-overlapping 24-hour period. As it is stated on page 5 of the permit that <br />"Relief ...shall not be granted when the petTttittee has control over the discharges", we <br />understand that the effluent coming from that pond's outfall must meet primary <br />limitations. Is this correct? <br />13. Assume snowmelt is the sole source of water flowing into a pond. Assume this <br />snowmelt occurred in a volume equivalent to that of a 8-year, 24-hour event. Now <br />assume a sample of aself-discharge was not taken until 50 hours after pond inflow <br />stopped. It is our understanding that this discharge must meet primary limitations. [s <br />this correct? <br />l4. Assume the same scenario above, but change the time for sampling the pond's self- <br />discharge from 50 hours after pond inflow stopped to 45 hours after pond inflow <br />stopped. If the discharge was sampled at 45 hours after pond inflow stopped, we assume <br />the discharge would be eligible for relief from primary limitations. Is this correct? <br />I5. Now assume the same scenario in 13., but change the time of sampling from 50 hours <br />to 24 hours after pond inflow had stopped. What part, if any, of this discharge is <br />required to meet primary limitations, and what part, if any, of this discharge is eligible <br />for relief from primary limitations? <br />B. Summary of Rationale <br />In the third paragraph of Page 4 (Part N.B.), it is stated that "The ponds are currently <br />being operated in the "containment" mode, meaning that the volume from a storm event <br />is contained for a prescribed period while settling occurs, after which time the discharge <br />structure is manually opened and discharge to state waters occurs. The permittee is <br />reevaluating all outfalls, using the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology approved <br />SEDCAD hydrology model, for potential conversion to the "treatment" mode, wherein <br />discharge occurs automatically when the volume reaches a certain level." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.