Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLC ~II IIIIIIIII <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Dcpanmem of Natural Resources <br />Lt I t Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 11031 Hbb-3567 <br />FAl UU41 Hf2-8106 <br />January l2, 1998 <br />~~~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Rnmer <br />Jon C. Kubic governor <br />L,mes 5. Lochhead <br />Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment E.ecmive Direanr <br />WQCD-PE-B2 M¢hael H. Lnn~ <br />Division Dircaor <br />4300 Cherry Creek Drive South <br />Denver, CO 80222 <br />Re: Comments on Draft Individual Industrial Permit, No. CO-0045161, Colowyo Coal <br />Company, L.P., Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology Permit No. C-81-019 <br />Dear Mr. Kubic: <br />The Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (DMG) has received copies of three documents <br />pertaining to a proposed individual industrial permit for Colowyo Coal Company, L.P. These <br />documents are: "Authorization to Discharge Under the Colorado Discharge Permit System, Colowyo <br />Coal Company, L.P." (31 pages), "Colorado Discharge Permit System (CDPS), Summary of Rationale. <br />Colowyo Coal Company, L.P., Colowyo Mine, CDPS Permit Number CO-0045161, Moffat County" <br />(14 pages), and "Colowyo Coal Company, L.P., Permit No. CO-0045161, Comments on Draft CDPES <br />Permit and Rationale" (Memorandum from Kimberley A. Wolf of Colowyo Coal Company to Jon C. <br />Kubic of CDPHE, dated September 30, 1997, 8 pages). The Division provides the following comments: <br />A. Draft CDPS Permit No. CO-0045161 <br />Two sets of primary effluent limitations are proposed (Permit, pages 3 and 4). This is <br />apparently to address the operator's proposed occasional discharges of vehicle wash <br />water and/or water pumped from coal production pits ("Whole effluent toxicity testing <br />requirements will apply to outfalls when pit pumping occurs or vehicle wash water is <br />discharged ...", Rationale, page 4, second paragraph). The need for this is apparently <br />because "the (Water Quality Control) Division has found that discharges of water in coal <br />production pits that has had reasonable time to contact with the coal seam (and similar <br />sources from coal mines a[ similar sites) may have effluent toxicity" (Rationale, page <br />ll.second paragraph). <br />The DMG wonders whether outfalls of sediment ponds which regularly receive surface <br />water runoff from areas at which coal is stockpiled and/or loaded should be required to <br />meet the same acute eftuent limitation as the outfalls through which pit pumpage is <br />discharged. <br />