Laserfiche WebLink
A habitat survey was also conducted for the <br />Service concurred that Preble's Meadow J <br />Souble's has been captured ups s~~ from~P~sent within the s bj ~~az apse (Zapus hu preblei <br />th Platte dsonius <br />~sPersal co dorr The $rg ~ompS6n River ont the north e Big ~ompson River and also a Service notes tl ad the <br />adverse effects to Preble's Protn'ded r~I a tit develo ~t pOttion of the Croiss do~~~ near the <br />excluded Pment or other actions on ant property may ser~,e as a <br />Should Preble's poprr]ations exi~do hal for prebte's di tills site should not have <br />modi$cation ofPreble' wnstre spersal along the Bi direct <br />sedimentation s habitat downstream (for ex ~ from the site, acti g Th°rnPson Riv <br />) may be sub' ample, throw °ns °Il the site that result ins rs not <br />September 7, 2001 Ject to previsions of the Endan ered ~ alterat]on of existing flow re srgni&cant <br />{Attachment 10}. B Species Act. ~~, or <br />See the letter. from the Service dated <br />Regarding the Endan <br />submitted to gered Species Act with re <br />the Colorado Office of gard to South platte <br />depletions totaling 7138 acre-feet of eve fate En River depleions, a <br />Leased weer and Provided with the water substinrte su <br />water from the City of Lovel p01ation loss and o Permit application pP1Y plan, <br />acre-feet. in additi and, which, after ther sources of loss will Ire sh°ws that annual <br />depletions to ~' there are nO Plans for raver transit losses of 3.'75 % replaced with 200 acre_ <br />the South platte River. water storage in the fu has a replacement feat of <br />Endangered S ~ie• Therefore, it has been del yield of92.24 <br />A letter Pecies habitats will not occur. ermined that <br />{mf°rmal Section 7 Consultation <br />the U, 5. Fish and Wildlife Se ) requestin c <br />consultant Mike Sa rvrce on Dece g oncurrence of this decision was sent to Sand V <br />vage, Sand tuber 9, 2003. Through discussions betwe <br />lv'storicai depletions Y Vana-Miller (USFWS Y and-Miller of <br />address the are no longer an issue }~ and Don Anderson en the applicant, their <br />Green? Croissant mi because all the augmentation water thatWS)~ rt was del <br />delivered throw rang operation d le mined that <br />consulted on, ~ reclamation facilities to ~ horns will ultfmatel will be leased from Loveland to <br />See a-mails betwe Loveland's Green Ridge Gladed~ve exclusively from w <br />Mazch 8, 2004 conc ~ Don Anderson Reservoir ater that is <br />~g with the "no effect" ~S~rS}and Rena Brand (Co s which has already been <br />4.4• Cle decision (Attachment 21). ~) dated January 22 2004 and <br />an Air Act General Conformity Review {Section 176{c}). <br />The proposed pemnt <br />I76{c) of the Cl ~ bean analyzed for co <br />can Air Act. It has been del nfomrity aPplicabiIitypursuant to re <br />minimis levels of direct erttissions of a enf tuned that the ac ' gulations i <br />Any later indirect a eria pollu hvrtres Proposed under mPlementing Section <br />P mut be P cablmrssions aze benhe 1Canot wrthmtant or ~ pc~c hmm~g P o e ex this P mutCFR Part 93e1 Sae <br />racti ly controlled the Co einpted b 40 <br />rps. For these reasons a confo r Brartr resporrsibili <br />rmity determination is t3' and generally <br />5• Evaluation of not required for this <br />Alternatives f33 CFR part 320.4 <br />Section 404 {a){2)(u} and 40 CFR Part 230, <br />~)(l) Prohibits the dischar a 10(a)j, <br />proposed discharge is the least g °f dredged or fill material into waters of th <br />alternatives pun-spent to 40 CFR 2 p j p entally lama <br />a range of reasonable alternaEives includin g'r'gPracncable alte e United States unless the <br />The NEp,9 and im mative. The Corps has eval <br />a]ternahbe and action alt g the no Plementing regulations at 4 paled <br />considered red etnatives that action alternative be evaluated. 0 CFR 1502.14 re <br />sonable alte meet the objectives or Under NEpA t 9wre that <br />detailed discussion of on matives, These alternative purpose and need oft he no action <br />and ofI'site alte s d0 not need to be available to the a en'ed alternative aze <br />matives. <br />5.1 No Federal Action. ppl1Cant• Following is a <br />No Impact Alternative 1-Avoid Section 404 rurisdictfon Alternative 1 (describe <br />Project. Gre d rn the pemrit application as <br />rys File N~ ~ Croissant AP,f;RBate Mining <br />Co o. 200180205 <br />APPllcanr. LovWand Read <br />Waternay: gi Y Mix, Inc, Pg t 8 of 53 <br />8 ~ot"P$On µ'°tlands, Weld County, CO <br />