My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL46842
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL46842
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:21:16 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 2:56:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/29/2007
Doc Name
MSHA Report Regarding Landslide
From
MSHA
To
Trapper Mining Inc
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br />rock or regolith slips along a concave upwazd-curved surface while at the same time <br />rotating backward. The toe of the rockslide exhibits characteristics of an "earthflow;' <br />which is a sluggish, erratic flow of clayey or silty regolith down relatively gentle slopes. <br />Although water may have lubricated or hydrostatically opened some critical bedding <br />planes, the failure material was not fluidized or saturated, and instead consisted of <br />large, intact sequences of strata. <br />Observation of structure contour maps provided by the mine indicates that the dip of <br />strata becomes locally steeper beneath the rockslide area (figure 9). The maximum dip <br />calculated from structure contours on the L Seam is 11.7 degrees, compared to values of <br />9-10 degrees outside the slide area. The strike of tension gashes documented at the <br />head of the rockslide, in the slump azea, is parallel to the strike of structure contours on <br />the underlying coal seams. This suggests that the rockslide moved from the southwest, <br />which is the structurally and topographically highest point, down-slope toward the <br />northeast, which is not only the direction of maximum dip but also the point of lowest <br />structural and topographic elevation. Additionally, the transverse shear ridge that <br />bounds the western side of the failure is approximately perpendicular to the strike, or in <br />other words parallel to the maximum dip direction. <br />The inclinometer data shared by the mine indicate that slip has been detected in or near <br />all six of the mined coal seams, although the greatest displacement has historically been <br />recorded proximal to the L Seam. Movement near the L Seam has reportedly pinched <br />off water monitoring wells, and pinched off inclination monitoring holes. Despite the <br />reported presence of a tonstein (altered volcanic ash layer) being associated with the L <br />Seam, the exposure visited in the field was not characterized by water-sensitive clay, <br />and the irregular bedding nature of the layer did not suggest that it represented a <br />major, laterally extensive bedding-pazallel weakness even if it can serve as a useful <br />marker horizon. Mine personnel further indicated that slip is recorded at a vaziety of <br />stratigraphic levels even near the same seam, and is not localized to a consistent level <br />below, within, or above any seam. It is therefore likely that the bounding fireclay and <br />roof mudshales, which may host water-sensitive clay, represent general layers of <br />weakness. The generally low permeability of fireclay and mudshale associated with <br />coal commonly defines an aquiclude, which can allow ponding and saturation on top of <br />the shale, as well as an increase in hydrostatic pressure along the bottom of the shale <br />where dipping strata define a confined aquifer with hydrostatic head. That this <br />scenario exists at the Trapper Mine is supported by mine personnel observations that <br />some exploration holes yielded a substantial amount of water under pressure. <br />It is difficult to attribute the initiation of the rockslide solely to the additional 2° of dip <br />beneath the failure area. Although the event occurred in a relatively short time frame <br />(45-60 minutes), failure may have been initiated up to two yeazs ago, following the <br />development of the G-5 strike pit that undercut the toe of the slope. This interpretation <br />is supported by the review of ground movement data conducted in the May 2, 2005, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.