Laserfiche WebLink
REPORT NO. MW06-065 <br />SUMMARY <br />As requested by Coal Mine Safety and Health (CMSH) District 9, an investigation of <br />geological and geotechnical conditions was conducted at Trapper Mining, Inc.'s <br />Trapper Mine on October 17, 2006, in response to a large mass wasting (ground failure) <br />event that occurred on October S, 2006. The event encompassed approximately 300 <br />acres of virgin area adjacent to the active mine pits. Overall, the event can be <br />characterized as a massive rock slide because monitoring data suggest that failure <br />occurred along one or more bedding horizons within or near the top of several coal <br />seams. The toe of the slide exhibits characteristics of an earthflow, while the head of the <br />slide exhibits chazacteristics of a giant slump. <br />It is interpreted that when the G-5 strike pit was mined in 2004, support at the toe of the <br />slope was undercut, and that initial downslope movement may have initiated at that <br />time. The instrument data of the 2004 slide show that ground movement occurred far <br />beyond the expected influence azea of the G-5 strike pit. When the recent G-i dip pit <br />was excavated, additional confining stress was removed. It is likely that following <br />initial, nearly imperceptible, downslope creep, tension fractures developed near the <br />head of the eventual failure and provided conduits for water infiltration to lubricate or <br />hydrostatically uplift potential slip surfaces along bedding horizons. Precipitation was <br />much higher than normal prior to the ground failure. <br />In order to reduce the likelihood of experiencing future large ground failures of this <br />type and to mitigate the effects of the current event, it is suggested that the following <br />actions be incorporated into the mining plan: <br />1. Up-dip strike pits should not be mined, especially where structure contours <br />define a dip of greater than 10°; <br />2. Water infiltration should be controlled at high topographic elevations by the use <br />of geo-liners or diversion ditches. Particulaz care should be taken to ensure that <br />water is not running into open tension fractures that have already formed; <br />3. Dewatering axound the slide should be continued, recognizing that because the <br />permeability of coal measure rocks is low, effective dewatering of the <br />overburden requires a much longer time and larger area; <br />4. Overburden may have to be stripped from the topographic highs of the mass <br />wasting area to reduce the weight of material contributing to the driving forces <br />for movement; and <br />5. Slope stability monitoring, including the use of survey points, georeferenced <br />airphotos, inclinometer measurements, and piezometers, should be continued. <br />