My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL46842
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL46842
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:21:16 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 2:56:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/29/2007
Doc Name
MSHA Report Regarding Landslide
From
MSHA
To
Trapper Mining Inc
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />through surface fractures at the head of the failure (the area had precipitation much <br />higher than normal), and local changes in the strike and dip of the coal seams and coal <br />measure rocks. In order to reduce the likelihood of experiencing future lazge, ground <br />failure events and to mitigate the effects of the current event, it is suggested that the <br />following steps be taken: <br />1. Up-dip strike pits should not be mined, especially where structure contours define <br />a dip of greater than 10 degrees. By definition, a strike pit follows the contour of <br />the coal seam, and undercuts the toe of a broad portion of a slope directly below <br />the maximum dip angle of the slope. A change in mining method or mining <br />sequence is only way to avoid this kind of ground failure. <br />2. Water infiltration should be controlled at high topographic elevations by the use of <br />geo-liners or diversion ditches. Particular care should be taken to ensure that <br />water is not running into open tension fractures that have already formed. The . <br />area had precipitation unusually higher than normal prior to the ground failure. <br />3. Dewatering around the slide area should be continued in order to remove water <br />that could reduce the internal angle of friction and increase hydrostatic pressure <br />along critical potential failure horizons. Because some coal measure rocks are <br />chazacterized by low permeability, a dewatering program may take much longer to <br />be effective. Judging from the slide area, the dewatering program should be <br />expanded far beyond the boundary of an active pit. <br />4. Overburden may have to be stripped from the topographic highs of the current <br />failure area, to reduce the weight of material contributing to the driving forces for <br />movement. This could be an opportunity to contour a slope that diverts water <br />from the slump area of the slide. <br />5. Slope displacement monitoring, including the use of survey points, georeferenced <br />airphotos, inclinometer measurements, and piezometers, should be continued. The <br />monitoring program has already proven its effectiveness by alerting mine <br />personnel to movement, thus allowing equipment and miners to be withdrawn <br />from the affected area prior to failure. <br />Report Prepazed by: <br />f~1~ ~ . <br />Dai S. Choi <br />Mining Engineer <br />'~Ii~rn~~l_,~ c <br />Sandin E. Phillipson <br />Geologist <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.