My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL46833
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL46833
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:21:13 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 2:55:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/17/1994
Doc Name
BASIN RESOURCES GOLDEN EAGLE AND NEW ELK MINES WESTON LAS ANIMAS CNTY COLO
From
JIM TATUM & ASSOCIATES
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ <br />Mr. Daniel I. Hernandez __ <br />November 9, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />b. Regarding the ground water sump pump and drain in the <br />basement. This house stood for over 60 years with the same <br />location, irrigation patterns, and. probable water level depths <br />below ground with no evidence of subsidence and cracking. Why do <br />you think this damage. is now being caused by the same ground water <br />conditions that have existed over 60 years without problems? <br />4. The mine was required by_statute to_set bench marks and <br />carefully monitor f.or subsidence before they mined under. our _, <br />property., The mine also represented to us in the May 19, 1988, <br />letter that this would be done and of course they claim that it was <br />not. Why was the law not enforced? <br />5. You refer to Annual Hydrology Reports. Please advise us if <br />~. any report prior to 1990, reflects that our water level in our well <br />had dropped below 100 feet. In any event, advise us of the water <br />level of our well reflected in any such report. <br />6. Colorado Revised Statutes .34-48-106 provides for security to <br />be posted by anyone mining under another's property. Your office <br />says that the mine does not have to post security. Please explain <br />your reasoning and basis for this posture. <br />Very_truly yours, <br />JIM TATUM AND ASSOCIATES - _ <br />Jim Tatum <br />JT\dbl <br />cc: Office of Surface_Mining__.__ <br />~% <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.